Re: XPathDirectoryGenerator

2003-05-29 Thread Torsten Knodt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Conal Tuohy wrote: > transformer. So this would effectively mimic XPathDirectoryGenerator. But I > think a single XPathDirectoryGenerator would be a lot simpler, and worth > having. Because there are really people using it, I have put supp

RE: XPathDirectoryGenerator

2003-05-29 Thread Conal Tuohy
> Torsten Knodt wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm currently working on my patchset of the week ;). One > part is a modularized > > DirectoryGenerator. The only what is currently not included is the > > XPathDirectoryGenerator. As it can simply be simulated by &

Re: XPathDirectoryGenerator

2003-05-29 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
Torsten Knodt wrote: Hello, I'm currently working on my patchset of the week ;). One part is a modularized DirectoryGenerator. The only what is currently not included is the XPathDirectoryGenerator. As it can simply be simulated by XInclude, why having the code doubled? Or have I under

Re: XPathDirectoryGenerator

2003-05-27 Thread Torsten Knodt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 27 May 2003 23:14, Joerg Heinicke wrote: JH> Torsten Knodt wrote: JH> TK> CT> Also, is XPathDirectoryGenerator cachable? JH> TK> Code looks like DirectoryGenerators are cacheable. The documentations JH> TK> says n

Re: XPathDirectoryGenerator

2003-05-27 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Torsten Knodt wrote: CT> Also, is XPathDirectoryGenerator cachable? Code looks like DirectoryGenerators are cacheable. The documentations says no. I'm not yet an expert there in. Hello Thorsten, this feature is only two weeks old: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10528587111

Re: XPathDirectoryGenerator

2003-05-27 Thread Torsten Knodt
y what is currently not included is the CT> TK> XPathDirectoryGenerator. As it can simply be simulated by CT> TK> XInclude, why CT> TK> having the code doubled? Or have I understood something wrong CT> TK> with this thing? CT> Is it an issue that XPathDirectoryGenera

RE: XPathDirectoryGenerator

2003-05-27 Thread Conal Tuohy
Torsten Knodt wrote: > Hello, > I'm currently working on my patchset of the week ;). One part > is a modularized > DirectoryGenerator. The only what is currently not included is the > XPathDirectoryGenerator. As it can simply be simulated by > XInclude, why > having t

XPathDirectoryGenerator

2003-05-27 Thread Torsten Knodt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I'm currently working on my patchset of the week ;). One part is a modularized DirectoryGenerator. The only what is currently not included is the XPathDirectoryGenerator. As it can simply be simulated by XInclude, why having the code do