Re: database block not jvm depended anymore

2003-03-21 Thread Berin Loritsch
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: As you say: that one is excalibur related. But Berin already fixed that one [1] But AFAIK it's not yet even checked in and thereby far away from being relased. IIRC we wanted to go with release versions only - right? A very big temptation though :-

Re: database block not jvm depended anymore

2003-03-21 Thread Berin Loritsch
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: Hurray! By using composition rather than inherritance I removed the the dependency to the jvm. No split code anymore :) Thanks for pointing me on that Berin. Everything *should* work as before. And at least on my machine the samples are working. Pleas

Re: database block not jvm depended anymore

2003-03-21 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Torsten Curdt wrote: As you say: that one is excalibur related. But Berin already fixed that one [1] But AFAIK it's not yet even checked in and thereby far away from being relased. IIRC we wanted to go with release versions only - right? A very big temptation though :-/ If Avalon is not confide

Re: database block not jvm depended anymore

2003-03-21 Thread Christian Haul
On 20.Mar.2003 -- 11:09 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote: > Hurray! > > By using composition rather than inherritance I removed the > the dependency to the jvm. No split code anymore :) Kool! Chris. -- C h r i s t i a n H a u l [EMAIL PROTECTED] fingerprint: 99B0 1D9D 7919 644A 4837 7

Re: database block not jvm depended anymore

2003-03-21 Thread Torsten Curdt
As you say: that one is excalibur related. But Berin already fixed that one [1] But AFAIK it's not yet even checked in and thereby far away from being relased. IIRC we wanted to go with release versions only - right? A very big temptation though :-/ If Avalon is not confident enough to release i

Re: database block not jvm depended anymore

2003-03-21 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Torsten Curdt wrote: But we currently have the dependency to the split excalibur datasource package. So we can't remove the dependency from the build system right now, right? As you say: that one is excalibur related. But Berin already fixed that one [1] But AFAIK it's not yet even checked in an

Re: database block not jvm depended anymore

2003-03-21 Thread Torsten Curdt
Great! Thanks! Just one question: But we currently have the dependency to the split excalibur datasource package. So we can't remove the dependency from the build system right now, right? As you say: that one is excalibur related. But Berin already fixed that one [1] But AFAIK it's not yet even

RE: database block not jvm depended anymore

2003-03-20 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Torsten Curdt wrote: > Hurray! > > By using composition rather than inherritance I removed the > the dependency to the jvm. No split code anymore :) > > Thanks for pointing me on that Berin. > > Everything *should* work as before. And at least on > my machine the samples are working. > > Please

Re: database block not jvm depended anymore

2003-03-20 Thread David Crossley
Torsten Curdt wrote: > Hurray! > > By using composition rather than inherritance I removed the > the dependency to the jvm. No split code anymore :) > > Thanks for pointing me on that Berin. > > Everything *should* work as before. And at least on > my machine the samples are working. > > Please

Re: database block not jvm depended anymore

2003-03-20 Thread Torsten Curdt
ups.. I meant "dependent" ;) -- Torsten

database block not jvm depended anymore

2003-03-20 Thread Torsten Curdt
Hurray! By using composition rather than inherritance I removed the the dependency to the jvm. No split code anymore :) Thanks for pointing me on that Berin. Everything *should* work as before. And at least on my machine the samples are working. Please test! cheers -- Torsten