Joerg Heinicke wrote, On 27/06/2003 18.41:
Geoff Howard wrote:
To David's question:
I don't have an ant reference, but I don't think there's
a way to do that and still do the entity include. That's
why the resource Joerg pointed to exists I'd guess. You
can't have entities point to the children
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Vendredi, 27 juin 2003, à 15:52 Europe/Zurich, Geoff Howard a écrit :
Joerg, David and I are discussing alternatives to the current
build file entities for the sub-targets. One that's on the
table now is to use ANTModule from http://www.ct42.de/en/ch02.html.
See belo
Le Vendredi, 27 juin 2003, à 15:52 Europe/Zurich, Geoff Howard a écrit :
Joerg, David and I are discussing alternatives to the current
build file entities for the sub-targets. One that's on the
table now is to use ANTModule from http://www.ct42.de/en/ch02.html.
See below for the discussion that's
Joerg, David and I are discussing alternatives to the current
build file entities for the sub-targets. One that's on the
table now is to use ANTModule from http://www.ct42.de/en/ch02.html.
See below for the discussion that's happened so far.
As this would refactor the build (to a degree), I figure
Geoff Howard wrote:
To David's question:
I don't have an ant reference, but I don't think there's
a way to do that and still do the entity include. That's
why the resource Joerg pointed to exists I'd guess. You
can't have entities point to the children of the root node
by some magic I'm not aware
To David's question:
I don't have an ant reference, but I don't think there's
a way to do that and still do the entity include. That's
why the resource Joerg pointed to exists I'd guess. You
can't have entities point to the children of the root node
by some magic I'm not aware of, can you??
At 04
May I point to http://www.ct42.de/en/ch02.html?
Joerg
David Crossley wrote:
On 2003-03-30, Geoff Howard wrote:
Is there any strategy for making the xml fragments in
src/targets well-formed so editors don't barf on them?
That sounds like a good idea and makes me itch.
What do you think needs t
On 2003-03-30, Geoff Howard wrote:
> Is there any strategy for making the xml fragments in
> src/targets well-formed so editors don't barf on them?
That sounds like a good idea and makes me itch.
What do you think needs to be done?
Is it just that the multiple elements need
to be wrapped in a c
Is there any strategy for making the xml fragments in
src/targets well-formed so editors don't barf on them?
Geoff
