On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Bernhard Huber wrote:
> I compared sitemap.xml 1.8 and cocoon_20,
> I think version 1.8 is upto-date,as describing map:call which I didn't know.
> Probably 'haul' may answer it definitly...
Yes, the element is new (never was in 2.0) and will replace
the element.
Giacomo
I compared sitemap.xml 1.8 and cocoon_20,
I think version 1.8 is upto-date,as describing map:call which I didn't know.
Probably 'haul' may answer it definitly...
David Crossley wrote:
>I have conducted a comparison of all xdocs between
>cocoon_20_branch and HEAD. There were some
>differences.
I have conducted a comparison of all xdocs between
cocoon_20_branch and HEAD. There were some
differences. I have dealt with the necessary ones and
committed to CVS HEAD.
However, there is one document remaining that i cannot
determine which version is the true one. Would someone
else please deal
