Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Of course, slide + Wyona + etc is the final goal
Please let's not jump to conclusions ;-)
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog athttp://blogs.co
Jeff Turner wrote, On 19/02/2003 15.49:
...
So there's a half-formed plan over in Forrest-land to migrate to XHTML 2
as an intermediate format, and make it one of the frontend formats too:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=104351979527689&w=2
Then why not use html (ihtml), there ar
"Jeff Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I agree with Diana about moving all docs to the Wiki. It seems the
> best long-term solution, avoiding all the problems that a dual wiki/xdoc
> system would cause.
I disagree on that. IMO the "Wiki" syntax doesn't have the capability to
contextualize
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Jeff Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 03:11:44PM +1100, David Crossley wrote:
> > Diana Shannon wrote:
> >
> > Will people be able to do both ways - traditional patch/create
> > xdocs in cvs, or via the Wiki?
>
> With Chaperon integration, the next version of Forrest s
Hy;
The mentioning of "Wiki" triggered my curiousity:
If we move all docs to Wiki, then how can we maintain
different release versions of the docs ?
Or will there be only one single document version, that
fits for all released cocoon versions ?
Or do you propose to connect Wiki with an underlyi
