Re: AW: forms in coocon2, is SchemoX dead ?

2001-07-17 Thread Christian Haul
On 17.Jul.2001 -- 10:07 AM, Berin Loritsch wrote: > > a) XForms expects XML encoded parameters. I'm not 100% sure on > > Which means that for the two standard submission types (url encoded > and multipart), the XPath expression is used to reconstruct the XML > document. So, do you think this

Re: AW: forms in coocon2, is SchemoX dead ?

2001-07-17 Thread Ulrich Mayring
Christian Haul wrote: > > To me, XForms looks like the most importand standard on this but I > think it is not advisable to aim for a fully compliant implementation > for C2 because (please correct any errors) What I don't like about XForms is mainly that it needs a so-called XFormsProcessor, i.

Re: AW: forms in coocon2, is SchemoX dead ?

2001-07-17 Thread Berin Loritsch
Christian Haul wrote: > To me, XForms looks like the most importand standard on this but I > think it is not advisable to aim for a fully compliant implementation > for C2 because (please correct any errors) > > a) XForms expects XML encoded parameters. I'm not 100% sure on >this, bu

Re: AW: forms in coocon2, is SchemoX dead ?

2001-07-17 Thread Christian Haul
On 16.Jul.2001 -- 09:28 PM, java guru wrote: > I agree about the xform and xfdl..In future, i guess, > these concepts would go beyond just form validation > and handling.. To me it looks like xfdl is not actively maintained by W3C, since the document is rather old. > For now, from this discussio

Re: AW: forms in coocon2, is SchemoX dead ?

2001-07-17 Thread Steffen Stundzig
Hi, I'm one of the maintainers of SchemoX at the infozone group. SchemoX isn't dead. I would say, it sleeps. It's maintainers hasn't that time to develop it as desired, because of economical reasons. For now, I could say that SchemoX will go the way of extending the full blown form generator/va

Re: AW: forms in coocon2, is SchemoX dead ?

2001-07-16 Thread java guru
I agree about the xform and xfdl..In future, i guess, these concepts would go beyond just form validation and handling.. For now, from this discussion, I understand that we are all looking for some form of automated/simplified form generation/validation and handling..am i right?.. There is a des

AW: forms in coocon2, is SchemoX dead ?

2001-07-16 Thread Thorsten Mauch
Our Company is also interessed to help. Do you have already a design ? BTW whats the relation from between XFDL http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-XFDL and Xforms http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms/? Is it correct that xforms is only for the web while XFDL is a more gernaeral aproach ? >From the SchemoX webs

AW: forms in coocon2, is SchemoX dead ?

2001-07-16 Thread Jakob Praher
hi, after talking to the founder of the schemoX project (and asking the same question) I know that it is not dead, suspended though. As I am highly in need for a (X)form rendering and validating engine, I will try to play with the schemoX codebase.. It would be great if anyone would join my effo