Stephan Michels wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Sven Kitschke wrote:
>
>>Ok, I've a patch against an actual cvs copy (cocoon_2_0_3_branch).
>>Should i create a patch entry at bugzilla?
>>
[snip]
>
> I also noticed the bug, thanks for the patch.
> Patch is applied, please cross-check.
>
> St
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Sven Kitschke wrote:
> Ok, I've a patch against an actual cvs copy (cocoon_2_0_3_branch).
> Should i create a patch entry at bugzilla?
>
> Sven Kitschke wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > using the cinclude or the xinclude transformer
> > i get everytime the comments from the source
>
Ok, I've a patch against an actual cvs copy (cocoon_2_0_3_branch).
Should i create a patch entry at bugzilla?
Sven Kitschke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> using the cinclude or the xinclude transformer
> i get everytime the comments from the source
> documents DTD included. This results in ca.
> 114 kB extra
Hi,
using the cinclude or the xinclude transformer
i get everytime the comments from the source
documents DTD included. This results in ca.
114 kB extra with the DocBook DTD.
Although I've not tried to reproduce bug #5973 and
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-users&m=102507582917917&w=2