-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
well I'm using Trac in at the moment at its really nice but it has in my
idea one really big disadvantage which is its privileges system. What do
I mean? You cannot give users the e.g. anonymous ones the possibility to
report and edit a bug/feature
On 27 Apr 2005, at 10:30, Tom Schindl wrote:
Now there would be a perfect point to move AxKit into such a
Bug/Feature
tracking system. Bugs could be scheduled, ... .
I've talked to Dirk about the possibility of us using Trac, which seems
to integrate lots of project management features very nicel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Sergeant schrieb:
| On 27 Apr 2005, at 02:06, Tom Schindl wrote:
|
|> Although I can not vote I would second this. I would also suggest to
|> register for the issue/bug tracking one of the apache possibilities JIRA
|> looks really cool although wri
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Yes, the ASF has asked us to make this move at some point also.
For the record - note that we -asked-; nothing more; nothing less. If this
community feels it is more productive on CVS that is fine too.
However we ultimately will more and more tie in
On 27 Apr 2005, at 02:06, Tom Schindl wrote:
Although I can not vote I would second this. I would also suggest to
register for the issue/bug tracking one of the apache possibilities
JIRA
looks really cool although written in java. I haven't looked at scarab
until now but could take a look. Bugzill
Matt Sergeant wrote:
Proposal: After we release 1.6.3, we migrate to subversion.
Apparently it's a very simple process, and I've used svn on a couple of
projects now and I'm happy with its stability and performance.
Votes please!
+1
/me also needs to recall how to ssh there.
--
Robin Berjon
Res
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Although I can not vote I would second this. I would also suggest to
register for the issue/bug tracking one of the apache possibilities JIRA
looks really cool although written in java. I haven't looked at scarab
until now but could take a look. Bugzill
On Apr 26, 2005, at 11:59 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Proposal: After we release 1.6.3, we migrate to subversion.
Apparently it's a very simple process, and I've used svn on a couple
of projects now and I'm happy with its stability and performance.
Votes please!
+1
--
Michael Nachbaur <[EMAIL PROTEC
Proposal: After we release 1.6.3, we migrate to subversion.
Apparently it's a very simple process, and I've used svn on a couple of
projects now and I'm happy with its stability and performance.
Votes please!
+1
