On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Also note we need to apply the new Apache 2.x license to everything
> before release.
As this is your first 2.x release - feel free to ping me if oyu need help,
explanations or other assistance.
http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html
Dw
On 26 Apr 2005, at 21:33, Michael Nachbaur wrote:
On Apr 26, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
OK guys, I think we should put out a new axkit release. There are
lots of reports that CVS is stable, and even if there are things we
should fix we can do them in 1.6.4 (or whatever the next
On Apr 26, 2005, at 8:57 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
OK guys, I think we should put out a new axkit release. There are lots
of reports that CVS is stable, and even if there are things we should
fix we can do them in 1.6.4 (or whatever the next number we choose is)
afterwards.
Any objections or
Michael Nachbaur wrote:
On Apr 26, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
OK guys, I think we should put out a new axkit release. There are lots
of reports that CVS is stable, and even if there are things we should
fix we can do them in 1.6.4 (or whatever the next number we choose is
On Apr 26, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
OK guys, I think we should put out a new axkit release. There are lots
of reports that CVS is stable, and even if there are things we should
fix we can do them in 1.6.4 (or whatever the next number we choose is)
afterwards.
Any objections or
OK guys, I think we should put out a new axkit release. There are lots
of reports that CVS is stable, and even if there are things we should
fix we can do them in 1.6.4 (or whatever the next number we choose is)
afterwards.
Any objections or comments? I'll wait until the weekend for votes.