Re: Poor performance of document() in XSL [Was: Re: simpel cocoon question]

2002-11-08 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Thursday, Nov 7, 2002, at 16:19 Europe/London, Joerg Heinicke wrote: normally this won't work. You create a Result Tree Fragment in $colours and have to convert it to a node set using node-set() extension function. This is not possible when using XSLTC. Sorry for the red-herring! I did n

Re: Poor performance of document() in XSL [Was: Re: simpel cocoon question]

2002-11-07 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Wednesday, Nov 6, 2002, at 21:26 Europe/London, Stephen Ng wrote: I say, document() is good for rapid prototyping, but is a poor choice for final deployment for performance reasons. Use aggregation instead. The Cocoon developers recommend to use aggregation or xinclude because of SoC (XSLT

RE: Poor performance of document() in XSL [Was: Re: simpel cocoon question]

2002-11-06 Thread Stephen Ng
> > I say, > > document() is good for rapid prototyping, but is a poor choice for > > final deployment for performance reasons. Use aggregation instead. > > The Cocoon developers recommend to use aggregation or > xinclude because of SoC (XSLT is for transforming, not for > aggregating content).

RE: Poor performance of document() in XSL [Was: Re: simpel cocoon question]

2002-11-05 Thread Leigh Dodds
#setURIResolver(javax.xml. transform.URIResolver) > -Original Message- > From: Ilya A. Kriveshko [mailto:ilya@;kaon.com] > Sent: 05 November 2002 14:33 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Poor performance of document() in XSL [Was: Re: simpel cocoon > question] > > > SAX

Poor performance of document() in XSL [Was: Re: simpel cocoon question]

2002-11-05 Thread Ilya A. Kriveshko
SAXESS - Hussayn Dabbous wrote: But you also could do it directly within the xslt context: You can use the document() function in your XSLT-file. This function allows you to refer to data contained within another XML-file. This is completely decoupled from cocoon though. It's more about how to w