Re: Port 8180 works, port 80 with mod_jk doesn't ... and it feels so close

2002-10-14 Thread Geoff Howard
Interesting. Thanks. --- Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 11 October 2002 22:05, Geoff Howard wrote: > > > P.S. Do you really mean 8180? > > FYI, Debian seems to do this. I work on that port > too. > > Best, > > Kjetil > -- > Kjetil Kjernsmo > Astrophysicist/IT > Cons

Re: Port 8180 works, port 80 with mod_jk doesn't ... and it feels so close

2002-10-14 Thread Kjetil Kjernsmo
On Friday 11 October 2002 22:05, Geoff Howard wrote: > P.S. Do you really mean 8180? FYI, Debian seems to do this. I work on that port too. Best, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Astrophysicist/IT Consultant/Skeptic/Ski-orienteer/Orienteer/Mountaineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PR

Re: Port 8180 works, port 80 with mod_jk doesn't ... and it feels so close

2002-10-11 Thread Geoff Howard
I think you just need to add JkMount /* ajp13 right below your other JkMount. 0 You can see in the log below that / is processed with an exact match, and /index.html is processed with no match - meaning it wasn't sent on to cocoon correctly as the other was. Geoff P.S. Do you really mea