Hi java guru,
Tuesday, September 04, 2001, 8:38:37 PM, you wrote:
jg> Hi.,
jg> Correct me if wrong..
jg> 1. The xml/xsl rendering in c2 is done on server side.
jg> Then why do u need to compress the xml/xsp for client
jg> side?
But if i even generate HTML-files, anyway i want/can compress th
Hmm - seems to me that the pages need to be redesigned ...
good webpage design = smaller and faster
w/out throwing more technology at the issue
(you can always allow people to get more/heavier/bigger stuff
if they *choose* to do so...)
YMMV>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/09/2001 11:13:03
>>>Hi ja
Hi.,
Again., let me if i have mistaken anything..
1. When we are talking about html over internet, we
are talking about a server and a client(browser). You
only have control over your side(server side). You
DONT have control over the client(browser side).
2. Any compression mechanisms(let it
.
> -Original Message-
> From: java guru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 05 September 2001 2:01 pm
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Andrew Answer
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: xml compressing
>
>
> Hi.,
> Again., let me if i have mistaken anything..
>
> 1. W
Excuse-me if this is out-of-subject or if I didn't properly understood the
previous message but the server-side can send a compressed page with a
Response-Header "content-Encoding gzip" for exemple indicating that the page
is compressed and the client-side "can" decompressed the page to display
Hi.,
I feel sorry for leading this topic off cocoon2.
Hope this will not extend beyond limits.
But., yes, you can do that all., but as already
someone explains you cannot bundle all html+images
together in this method..and this kinda stuff is
highly client dependent...
--- Xavier Renard <[EM
>
> You can't compress the html+images though, only one
> thing at once as it
> t'were.
>
> Don't take what I say as gospel - I've been wrong
> before ;)
>
> J.
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: java guru [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
-
> From: Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 3:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: xml compressing
>
>
> I have been fiddling around alot with sending gzip compressed streams to a
> browser.
> and have the following in
secure
Klaus
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 4:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: xml compressing
>
>
> they're not allowing GIF and JPEG then either ?
> I have hard to
S_a_l_t_s_t_o_r_m
- Original Message -
From: "Morrison, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 3:08 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: xml compressing
> Whether browsers support compression (usually either gzip
From: "Klaus Bertram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 4:02 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: xml compressing
> Hi Thomas,
>
> comperssing is nice, but what ist about fire-walls!?
>
> at great industries they don't a
11 matches
Mail list logo
