You visit http://www.linuxjournal.com//article.php?sid=6237
for Solaris performance
regards
haris peco
On Tuesday 24 September 2002 11:10 am, Thomas Brusa wrote:
> Hi all
>
> We're developing a cocoon-application (so far only xslt pipelines,
> no apps) on a SunOS server.
> Everything works out w
Christopher Painter-Wakefield wrote:
>The most obvious thing that jumps out here other than raw MHz is that you
>are running C2.1-dev on the Sun and C2.0.3 on the PC, so you aren't really
>comparing apples to apples. Maybe that isn't a factor,
>
It is a factor. Of course not x10, but could be c
Hi all
We're developing a cocoon-application (so far only xslt pipelines,
no apps) on a SunOS server.
Everything works out well, but we're experiencing heavy
performance problems. To make sure our application could be
running fast, we tested it on a PC, which resulted in more than
ten times fast
The most obvious thing that jumps out here other than raw MHz is that you
are running C2.1-dev on the Sun and C2.0.3 on the PC, so you aren't really
comparing apples to apples. Maybe that isn't a factor, but I would
certainly want to check it out before anything else. Especially with that
"-dev
Hmmm...a 2.4Ghz Pentium beats a 400Mhz SPARC?!
Not surprising. In general, Sun SPARC/Solaris JVMs are
tuned for better SMP performance, and can lag on single
processor CPU intensive performance. But you should
be comparing like systems...I/O, cache, default JVM
parameters, etc all can make a di
homas Brusa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 3:41 PM
Subject: Sun vs. PC
> Hi all
>
> We're developing a cocoon-application (so far only xslt pipelines,
> no apps) on a SunOS server.
> Everything works out well,
Hi all
We're developing a cocoon-application (so far only xslt pipelines,
no apps) on a SunOS server.
Everything works out well, but we're experiencing heavy
performance problems. To make sure our application could
be running fast, we tested it on a PC, which resulted in more
than ten times fas
