Reporting to the Director of Baker 3.0 Strategy and Infrastructure, responsible
for Baker Library technology service delivery and planning, monitoring
technology needs and support, and ensuring KLS has the information technology
it needs to successfully accomplish its goals. This position serves
As one of the 15 schools at Harvard University, Harvard Business School (HBS)
is located just across the river in Boston, a short walk from Harvard Square in
Cambridge. HBS educates leaders who make a difference in the world. With a team
of librarians, researchers, educators, statisticians, jour
Hi,
The FCIG's report has been updated to add an Appendix C containing the
responses of the Open Library Foundation to our questions.
The updated report is available in various formats:
* Wiki: https://wiki.code4lib.org/FCIG_Report
* PDF: https://wiki.code4lib.org/images/a/a0/Fcig_report.pdf
* M
It's hard to quantify or qualify how significant MarcEdit has been for many
staff in libraries. Terry has saved people untold work though his own work.
And, indeed, made things possible that (given the lousy tools we spend tens and
hundreds of thousands of dollars for each year) would never ha
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:42 AM, James Fournie
wrote:
> Hi Sarah,
>
> I think what you are asking about is an "air gap".
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_gap_(networking)
>
> Here's a blog entry from Bruce Schneier with some best practices:
>
> https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/10/ai
Thank you all for the clarifications and for the pointer to VIAF. If I
decide to use VIAF, I will make sure I pull the LCNAF ID for the name
record and reconstruct the LC URI to store in the $0 field. Or maybe I will
store both the VIAF URI in the $1 and the LCNAF URI in the $0.
I was vaguely awar
If you use VIAF, this value shouldn't go into the $0. This value goes into
the $1 -- the $0 has been set aside to handle the URI to the actual
semantic object, the $1 is set aside for aggregations like VIAF.
--tr
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Alexander Duryee wrote:
> Josh,
>
> Depending on
Yes, Kevin is correct. MarcEdit does have this functionality, and a number
of controlled vocabularies from a number of national libraries are defined
as well. MarcEdit automatically can reach out to pretty much any of the
services that are defined within the $2.
--tr
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:
Josh,
Depending on your planned workflow, we've had better results for
programmatic authorization using the VIAF API (
https://www.oclc.org/developer/develop/web-services/viaf.en.html) - and
storing its LCNAF identifier after sifting through the results - than using
the native id.loc.gov API.
Re
And since Terry just responded rather humbly, allow me to plug his MarcEdit:
http://marcedit.reeset.net/adding-localcustom-linked-data-resolution-to-marcedits-linked-data-tool
I was just looking into this reference as his email arrived.
Anyways - take a look at MarcEdit. I believe it is possib
The $0 is the correct field, but you would not link to this value:
http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85095334 not the HTML page. The $0
and $1 are reserved for machine readable endpoints. They should *not* include
links to HTML pages.
--tr
-Original Message-
From: Code for Lib
Yes, I believe it is $0, but if you insert a URI you do not include a
parenthetical notation. See:
http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/ecbdcntf.html
All that said, best check with a cataloger.
HTH,
Kevin
On 8/25/17 11:37, Josh Welker wrote:
Related question: I want to store linked data
Hi Sarah,
I think what you are asking about is an "air gap".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_gap_(networking)
Here's a blog entry from Bruce Schneier with some best practices:
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/10/air_gaps.html
James
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Coates, Sarah w
Related question: I want to store linked data URI references in my MARC
records. If I want to store the URI to an LC Name Authority entry such as
this one (http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2010056162.html), what is
the best way to do that? My guess would be to store it in a 100 control
subfield
That's exactly what I needed. Thanks, Kevin!
Joshua Welker
Information Technology Librarian
James C. Kirkpatrick Library
University of Central Missouri
Warrensburg, MO 64093
JCKL 2260
660.543.8022
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Kevin Ford wrote:
> There's no reason to screen scrape the resu
There's no reason to screen scrape the results.
The label service permits the use of the "Accept" header. For example:
curl -i -L -H "Accept: application/rdf+xml"
http://id.loc.gov/authorities/label/orchids
Take note of the initial set of response headers:
HTTP/1.1 302 FOUND
Location: http:
Thanks, Nathan. That looks like it will work if I do it manually, but there
is no interface for doing it programmatically. Is LC okay with me screen
scraping the search results?
Joshua Welker
Information Technology Librarian
James C. Kirkpatrick Library
University of Central Missouri
Warrensburg,
You can try our "label" service. See under "known label retrieval" here:
http://id.loc.gov/techcenter/searching.html
I would be glad to help further.
Thanks, Nate
-
Nate Trail
Network Development & MARC Standards Office
LS/ABA/NDMSO
LA308, Mail Stop 4402
Li
I have sort of inherited authority control recently at my library, and I
want to find some way to automate some common workflows. I am looking for
an easy way to query blind name references against the LC Name Authority
master file. There is no API for searching it on the web, and the name file
its
19 matches
Mail list logo