Re: [CODE4LIB] Persistent Identifiers for organizations/institutions.

+1 to Stephen. Organization is a horridly complex concept. Any work being done has to address the past and the future, because time keeps a goin' on. kc On 10/11/17 2:34 PM, Stephen Hearn wrote: > From the "OpenPIIR Product Scope and Principles," Final Version 2017-July > 17-- "The complexity of

Re: [CODE4LIB] Needed: some metadata documentation examples

Yep. Thanks! - kc On 10/11/17 1:34 PM, Stuart A. Yeates wrote: > Do you mean something like http://rioxx.net/ ? > > cheers > stuart > > -- > ...let us be heard from red core to black sky > > On 11 October 2017 at 10:20, Karen Coyle wrote: > >> Hello, all. I'm working on

Re: [CODE4LIB] Persistent Identifiers for organizations/institutions.

>From the "OpenPIIR Product Scope and Principles," Final Version 2017-July 17-- "The complexity of describing affiliation information for researchers increases dramatically when going back in time, while at the same time the potential benefits of linking research outputs and their contributors to

Re: [CODE4LIB] Needed: some metadata documentation examples

Do you mean something like http://rioxx.net/ ? cheers stuart -- ...let us be heard from red core to black sky On 11 October 2017 at 10:20, Karen Coyle wrote: > Hello, all. I'm working on some projects where we are trying to define > formats and guidance for metadata

Re: [CODE4LIB] Needed: some metadata documentation examples

These are all great! Thanks folks. And if anyone else has some to add, please do. The more I have the more chance of convincing the standards folks that we have a need, and we're ready. At least, that's my goal. kc On 10/10/17 7:43 PM, sjc5 wrote: > Hi Karen, > > Saw your C4L post... If it

Re: [CODE4LIB] Interest in serial summary holdings parsing?

Hi Andy, We are still working on the license terms before opening the project, but if you can give me your github account name I will send you a link. Wariness is understandable -- this works on very dirty data. Once you are added to the project you can look at our test cases in:

Re: [CODE4LIB] Persistent Identifiers for organizations/institutions.

Based on the intro: > Organizations/institutions are a key part of the scholarly communications ecosystem. However, we lack an openly licensed, independently run organizational identifier standard to use for common affiliation and citation use cases. I would assume any organization at all that

Re: [CODE4LIB] Persistent Identifiers for organizations/institutions.

Hi John, > On Oct 11, 2017, at 10:54 AM, John Chodacki wrote: > > Are you interested in serving as a the start-up host organziation? Do you > have organization data you are willing to contribute? Do you have other > resources that could be helpful for the project? Do

[CODE4LIB] Persistent Identifiers for organizations/institutions.

Organizations/institutions are a key part of the scholarly communications ecosystem. However, we lack an openly licensed, independently run organizational identifier standard to use for common affiliation and citation use cases. To define a solution to this problem, a group of interested

Re: [CODE4LIB] Needed: some metadata documentation examples

Hi Karen, These are called Metadata Application Profiles and you can read about them on this good Wiki page by Cornell Univ. Library staff: https://confluence.cornell.edu/display/mwgweb/CUL+Metadata+Application+Profiles. As noted on that page, A popular metadata application profile example is