Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG] On Behalf Of Kyle
Banerjee
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 7:22 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] curating code4lib
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Jonathan Rochkind <jonat...@dnil.net>
wrote:
> &g
Someone is on the list is bound to have extra megabytes left on their
archive.org sub at the end of the period. Maybe we could have a wiki page
describing the best crawl config so nothing gets left out? Remember that
re-crawling the same content doesn't incur a cost...
cheers
stuart
--
...let us
> Generally speaking, if you have to wonder about the value of something,
you
already have the answer ;)
Kyle, I honestly am not sure which answer you are suggesting is the right
one in cases where you have to wonder!
By temperament, most of us library professionals are inclined to want to
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> As I sit here watching my EAD files get indexed by Solr, I ask myself, “To
> what degree are we — the Code4Lib community — curating our content?”
>
> Seriously, our “community” generates content, and the bulk of it takes
As I sit here watching my EAD files get indexed by Solr, I ask myself, “To what
degree are we — the Code4Lib community — curating our content?”
Seriously, our “community” generates content, and the bulk of it takes three or
four forms: the mailing list, the journal, the wiki, and conference