(Does your feedreader lose its flavor on your next post overnight?)
If your readers say don't chew on it, but you edit it in spite?
Or if the comments say you're wrong, but you edit so you're right?
Wikipoem.
Rob Styles
Programme Manager, Data Services, Talis
tel: +44 (0)870 400 5000
fax: +44
On Feb 15, 2007, at 7:44 AM, Daniel Chudnov wrote:
What's the proper form: is it copasetic to add your own stuff? How
about replacing something you don't want on the list off with
another? Is there a limit to the number of nominations per author/
blog?
I think it should be OK to add your
At 05:17 AM 2/15/2007, you wrote:
(Does your feedreader lose its flavor on your next post overnight?)
If your readers say don't chew on it, but you edit it in spite?
Or if the comments say you're wrong, but you edit so you're right?
Wikipoem.
Rob Styles
Thank you all for making me
I was thinking of this as similar to the code4libcon process: put up
lots of proposals, set some kind of target size, and open up voting,
maybe with some tampering by the editor(s) to make sure the final
product has some balance. I had thought about an All-Star Game rule as
well: every blog in
Laura Smart wrote:
At 05:17 AM 2/15/2007, you wrote:
(Does your feedreader lose its flavor on your next post overnight?)
If your readers say don't chew on it, but you edit it in spite?
Or if the comments say you're wrong, but you edit so you're right?
Thank you all for making me actually
The xISBN service has now moved out of OCLC Research and is now being
supported by the Openly Informatics Division of OCLC. For more
information about about the xISBN service, please visit
http://www.worldcat.org/affiliate/webservices/xisbn/app.jsp
There was a delay in the transfer caused by the
On Feb 15, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Binkley, Peter wrote:
So I don't see any problem with nominating your own stuff (as I did,
indirectly), but I'd rather not see nominations removed - you may
not be
the best judge of your own stuff, after all.
+1
I updated