Re: [CODE4LIB] Calendar Data Exchange

2008-09-18 Thread John Fereira
Miriam Goldberg wrote: I'd go with icalendar. It plays nicely with most major calendar applications. also, at the risk of sounding like a shill, I'm helping develop a web app (www.fusecal.com) that'll make it easier for web publishers to get their calendar information into users personal

Re: [CODE4LIB] Calendar Data Exchange

2008-09-18 Thread Cloutman, David
Thanks. Again, we're not looking so much for an application, but a _format_ that we can publish from our existing CMS in such a way that we could reasonably expect other organizations to import into their systems. Because it is likely that some of our community partners will need to create the

Re: [CODE4LIB] Calendar Data Exchange

2008-09-18 Thread Ross Singer
I doubt xCal is nearly as widely supported as iCal. Although not a 'standard', per se, Google Calendar's Atom extensions are also a possible option, given that anything that Google does has pretty broad support. http://code.google.com/apis/calendar/ -Ross. On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:25 PM,

Re: [CODE4LIB] Simulating off-campus for testing

2008-09-18 Thread Samuel Liston
Just getting a DSL line is pretty cheap. Using a DSL like to test lets you remove a lot more of your network from the equation than vpn'ing out or tunneling stuff over tor. Plus if your main connection out ever went down (not that _yours_ would, but that might factor into the decision making