Re: [CODE4LIB] web services and widgets: MAJAX 2, ticTOC lookup, Link/360 JSON, and Google Book Classes

2009-05-19 Thread Boheemen, Peter van
Clever idea to put the TicToc stuff 'in the cloud'. How are you going to keep it up-to-date ? Peter -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Godmar Back Sent: dinsdag 19 mei 2009 6:03 To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: [CODE4LIB] web s

Re: [CODE4LIB] web services and widgets: MAJAX 2, ticTOC lookup, Link/360 JSON, and Google Book Classes

2009-05-19 Thread Godmar Back
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Boheemen, Peter van wrote: > Clever idea to put the TicToc stuff 'in the cloud'. How are you going to > keep it up-to-date ? By periodically reuploading the entire set (which takes about 15-20 mins), new or changed records can be updated. A changed record is one w

[CODE4LIB] A Book Grab by Google

2009-05-19 Thread st...@archive.org
fyi - [the Google Book Settlement] "should not be approved" A Book Grab by Google by Brewster Kahle Tuesday, May 19, 2009 Washington Post | Opinions http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/18/AR2009051802637.html /st...@archive.org

Re: [CODE4LIB] A Book Grab by Google

2009-05-19 Thread Ethan Gruber
Google isn't a dumb company. They knew this would be the result all along. The real losers here are the libraries, especially the ones that funded the packaging and transport of their materials to the Google scanning centers (because Google didn't pay for that, fyi) But hey, it looks good to be p

Re: [CODE4LIB] A Book Grab by Google

2009-05-19 Thread Roy Tennant
On 5/19/09 5/19/09 € 9:59 AM, "Ethan Gruber" wrote: > Google isn't a dumb company. They knew this would be the result all along. > The real losers here are the libraries, especially the ones that funded the > packaging and transport of their materials to the Google scanning centers > (because Go

Re: [CODE4LIB] A Book Grab by Google

2009-05-19 Thread Karen Coyle
Roy Tennant wrote: I think that's an overly pessimistic assessment. There is a growing corpus of freely available content being managed by the Hathi Trust[1], that already numbers in the hundreds of thousands of volumes, and soon likely to be over a million. Also, since government documents are

Re: [CODE4LIB] A Book Grab by Google

2009-05-19 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
It's true that we have buns in the oven that are promissing. But it's also worth noting that HathiTrust mainly came about via the Google partnership, and they have certain limitations on what they can do with their scans that came out of the Google partnership (the current vast majority), as a

Re: [CODE4LIB] A Book Grab by Google

2009-05-19 Thread Eric Lease Morgan
On May 19, 2009, at 1:08 PM, Roy Tennant wrote: But hey, it looks good to be part of such a prestigious group of libraries in partnering with Google to deliver content freely* to the public! ...I think that's an overly pessimistic assessment. There is a growing corpus of freely available conte

Re: [CODE4LIB] A Book Grab by Google

2009-05-19 Thread Joe Atzberger
> BTW, we are sponsoring a mini-symposium on the topic of mass digitization > here at Notre Dame, tomorrow: > > http://www.library.nd.edu/symposium/ > Nice timing. --joe

Re: [CODE4LIB] A Book Grab by Google

2009-05-19 Thread Tim Spalding
> BTW, we are sponsoring a mini-symposium on the topic of mass digitization > here at Notre Dame, tomorrow: Any protesters expected? ;) T

Re: [CODE4LIB] A Book Grab by Google [hack]

2009-05-19 Thread Eric Lease Morgan
On May 19, 2009, at 1:24 PM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote: I applaud the Internet Archive and the Open Content Alliance's efforts. archive.org++ Try this hack with Google Books, not. $ echo http://ia300206.us.archive.org/3/items/librariesreaders00fostuoft/ > libraries.urls $ echo http://ia3

Re: [CODE4LIB] A Book Grab by Google [hack]

2009-05-19 Thread raj kumar
On May 19, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote: On May 19, 2009, at 1:24 PM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote: I applaud the Internet Archive and the Open Content Alliance's efforts. archive.org++ Try this hack with Google Books, not. $ echo http://ia300206.us.archive.org/3/items/librariesre

Re: [CODE4LIB] A Book Grab by Google [hack]

2009-05-19 Thread st...@archive.org
also, if your script can handle a redirect, you can use our locator to find each item, e.g. http://www.archive.org/download/librariesreaders00fostuoft/ http://www.archive.org/download/developmentofchi00tancuoft/ http://www.archive.org/download/rulesregulations00brituoft/ as the data does migrate

Re: [CODE4LIB] FW: [CODE4LIB] openurl.info ?

2009-05-19 Thread Roy Tennant
It looks like the URL is now redirecting appropriately. So sorry for the trouble. Roy On 5/17/09 5/17/09 € 12:50 AM, "Boheemen, Peter van" wrote: > Hmm Roy but should it be pointing to the PURL site ? > > http://www.openurl.info/ = http://purl.oclc.org/ > > Peter > > Drs. P.J.C. van Boheemen

Re: [CODE4LIB] FW: [CODE4LIB] openurl.info ?

2009-05-19 Thread Walker, David
Thanks for taking care of this, Roy. I appreciate it! --Dave == David Walker Library Web Services Manager California State University http://xerxes.calstate.edu From: Code for Libraries [code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Roy Tennant

Re: [CODE4LIB] vuFIND -- long term direction

2009-05-19 Thread Lovins, Daniel
>No intention to spoil our users and our fun with vuFIND. Just taking stock >after 1-2 years of working with >vuFIND, here are few general questions, Hi Yaaqov. Here's my take (and I'm cc'ing several of my colleagues in case they want to add or dispute anything): 1. is vuFIND primarily an expe