Karen,
Yes, I mean that if you have something like:
- example:book1 dc:title example:unknownTitle .
- example:book2 dc:title example:noTitle .
then this approach only works for the dc:title element (putting aside for now
what you said about dc:title requiring a literal). For any other elements
I don't think anyone would want to use one ontology for all work, especially
not a public ontology. I can imagine people using ontology extensions that are
specific to the purpose of validation, and I've found them useful myself.
I'm not arguing against using SPARQL for validation. I do think
It may be a fool's errand to ask how much it would cost to implement an
open source institutional repository, but here goes!
Let's first focus on open source and say that there won't be vendor costs
for ingesting or downloading materials, that we already have our own
purchased servers dedicated
Hi Scott,
No numbers here, but I recommend budgeting for either a) ongoing
programmer involvement (staff), or b) support costs with an
appropriate company for the platform you choose. Minimizing the amount
of unique code a programmer has to write can also go a distance to
reducing ongoing costs.
Scott,
Depending on the primary technologies you are using at your institution, you
could look at implementing the open source solution SobekCM. (
http://sobek.ufl.edu ) We are using this at our institution (
http://ufdc.ufl.edu/ufir ). We developed the system in-house over the last
Scott,
I agree with Kirsta, but in addition to technical staff you will absolutely
need someone who can develop and oversee policies associated with the IR, and
work with the communities who will be contributing contents. IRs are a service,
not a website or CMS (although the technology
Having done some research in this area for a chapter in
soon-to-be-published book, I concur with C. Sean Burns, Amy Lana and John
M. Budd that Little is known about the costs academic libraries incur to
implement and manage institutional repositories and the value these
institutional repositories
On 9/17/13 1:14 AM, Meehan, Thomas wrote:
Karen,
Yes, I mean that if you have something like:
- example:book1 dc:title example:unknownTitle .
- example:book2 dc:title example:noTitle .
Thomas, this does not work because the object of dc:title is the title
of the work (actually, the
Hey all,
I'm wondering if there are any libraries out there using ruby zoom for z39.50
access. It looks like the last version of the gem was released in 2007, and I
haven't been able to get it to work with recent versions of Ruby.
I'm trying to get it to build on Ruby 1.9.3. Has anybody else
Agreed that SPARQL is ugly, and there was discussion at the RDF
validation workshop about the need for friendly interfaces that then
create the appropriate SPARQL queries in the background. This shouldn't
be surprising, since most business systems do not require users to write
raw SQL or even
It sounds like you're saying that you're going to make a one year
commitment to develop software and then you're going to walk away from the
code/software/what have you, is that correct? If that is correct, my
question to you is: would you purchase software from a vendor that said,
Yeah we built
Hey James,
Yeah - we're using it for our LibraryFind to Blacklight conversion. We're
using the repo at https://github.com/bricestacey/ruby-zoom . Should just be
able to put it in your Gemfile as gem 'zoom', '~0.4.1', :git =
'https://github.com/bricestacey/ruby-zoom.git' and have it work.
If
The Assistant Dean of University Libraries for Learning and Outreach Services
assists the Dean and works closely with administrative and Library faculty
colleagues to carry out the mission of the Libraries and to provide
leadership, direction and oversight for the planning and operations of the
Hi Tom,
I think it comes down to what you really mean by a book not having a
title. A few options I can think of:
1) This book was published without a title (or whatever verb you want
there if you want to cover unpublished material)
2) The author did not give this work a title
3) I've never
On 13/09/13 23:32, Meehan, Thomas wrote:
However, it would be more useful, and quite common at least in a bibliographic context, to say This book does not
have a title. Ideally (?!) there would be an ontology of concepts like none, unknown, or
even something, but unspecified:
This book has
15 matches
Mail list logo
