wish to
> interact with. The MARC record is used to represent/transmit data, but it
> doesn't actually exist in the sense that systems use it internally as is.
>
> Having said that, I think the logical place to put control numbers from
> different schema is in 024 beca
SH is less than perfect, but it is even more "less than
> perfect" when we ignore what knowledge organization that it does provide.
>
> kc
>
>
> On 4/14/16 7:29 AM, Stephen Hearn wrote:
>
>> One factor that current search systems tend to overlook is that LCSH, all
>
system, Trove, implemented at
> > the NLA, in which subject faceting or hierarchy is absent from results
> > display:
> >
> > http://trove.nla.gov.au/book/result?q=ancient+egypt
> > http://trove.nla.gov.au/book/result?q=computer+art
> > http://trove.nla.gov.au/
terms (Guidelines for Subject
Access to Fiction, Drama, Poetry, etc.) might be another source of
controlled vocabulary discoverable on older records.
Stephen
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Mark Watkins
wrote:
> thank you that is very helpful!
>
--
Stephen Hearn, Metadata Strategist
ets and so
>> forth) rather than use RDF to express this kind of thing, although the
>> rules differ depending on the part of description and, in the case of the
>> kind of thing that prompted the question- the presence of clasps on rare
>> books- there are no rules. I won
#x27;ve had this suggested before and thought about it, but never had it
> high up enough in my list to test it out. Has anyone actually used the
> above to get a similar OPAC crawled successfully and not brought down
> on its knees?
>
> David
--
Stephen Hearn, Metadata Strategist
Technical Services, University Libraries
University of Minnesota
160 Wilson Library
309 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
Ph: 612-625-2328
Fx: 612-625-3428
ed towards contentDM or DSpace or
>> > > Omeka or Millennium. I've seen groups not plan enough for collecting
>> > data
>> > > and I've seen groups that are have been planning so long they forgot
>> what
>> > > they were supposed to be collecting in the first place.
>> > >
>> > > So, I'll just throw that vague question out there and see who wants to
>> > take
>> > > a swing.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Pat/@pberry
>> > >
>> >
>>
--
Stephen Hearn, Metadata Strategist
Technical Services, University Libraries
University of Minnesota
160 Wilson Library
309 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
Ph: 612-625-2328
Fx: 612-625-3428
it broke.
>
> (I kind of thought that was unlikely since that HTML page itself was machine
> generated -- but I guess they changed the software that generated it.
> Certainly I knew that scraping HTML was a bad thing to rely on... which is
> why I hope LC provides this in some format
