m: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
>>> Ross Singer
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 9:02 AM
>>> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
>>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Diversity of presenters (was bibliotechy's fat
>>> fingers)
&
f Of
Ross Singer
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 9:02 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Diversity of presenters (was bibliotechy's fat
fingers)
I'm more concerned about the latter ratio than the former (although we
could probably question the demographics of the electora
ferences/266837/
-- Michael
> -Original Message-
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Ross Singer
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 9:02 AM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Diversity of presenters (was bibliotec
"Forum 12 [. . .] library type (76% academic? oh my)."
Library type "academic" is probably going to dominate, because that's who
gets travel funding. The most probable alternative might be "vendor",
because they will get funding too.
-Wilhelmina Randtke
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Androme
>
>I would be interested to see the gender breakdown in the CfP for
>comparable conferences (LITA National, Access) and if Code4lib's numbers
>are noticeably lower, meeting with those groups to determine why.
>
>-Ross.
I put together a rough comparison of attendees (rather than presenters) at
the
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Ross Singer wrote:
> I would be interested to see the gender breakdown in the CfP for
> comparable conferences (LITA National, Access) and if Code4lib's numbers
> are noticeably lower, meeting with those groups to determine why.
>
I would be happy to run the For
I'm more concerned about the latter ratio than the former (although we could
probably question the demographics of the electorate, I think the process is
about as open and fair and democratic as we can really hope for). The low
percentage of female proposers is really the reason why there are s
