/
-- Michael
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
Ross Singer
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 9:02 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Diversity of presenters (was bibliotechy's fat
fingers)
I'm more concerned
, November 27, 2012 9:02 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Diversity of presenters (was bibliotechy's fat
fingers)
I'm more concerned about the latter ratio than the former (although we
could probably question the demographics of the electorate, I think the
process is about as open
-allmale-panels-at-tech-conferences/266837/
-- Michael
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
Ross Singer
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 9:02 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Diversity of presenters
I would be interested to see the gender breakdown in the CfP for
comparable conferences (LITA National, Access) and if Code4lib's numbers
are noticeably lower, meeting with those groups to determine why.
-Ross.
I put together a rough comparison of attendees (rather than presenters) at
the DLF
Forum 12 [. . .] library type (76% academic? oh my).
Library type academic is probably going to dominate, because that's who
gets travel funding. The most probable alternative might be vendor,
because they will get funding too.
-Wilhelmina Randtke
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Andromeda
I'm more concerned about the latter ratio than the former (although we could
probably question the demographics of the electorate, I think the process is
about as open and fair and democratic as we can really hope for). The low
percentage of female proposers is really the reason why there are
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
I would be interested to see the gender breakdown in the CfP for
comparable conferences (LITA National, Access) and if Code4lib's numbers
are noticeably lower, meeting with those groups to determine why.
I would be
