to bring in content from VIVO.
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Ethan
Gruber
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 2:37 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Embedding XHTML into RDF
Hi all,
Suppose I have RDF describing
+1
Rob
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:26 AM, aj...@virginia.edu aj...@virginia.edu wrote:
My inclination would be to keep the descriptive snippets in some kind of
content store with a good RESTful Web exposure and just use those URLs as the
values of description triples in your RDF. Then your
My inclination would be to keep the descriptive snippets in some kind of
content store with a good RESTful Web exposure and just use those URLs as the
values of description triples in your RDF. Then your RDF is genteel Linked
Data and your XHTML can be easily available to integrating services.
Not sure I would like running across dcterms:description with a URI as
its object. Not that dcterms:description has a defined range, but I
don't think most agents would expect anything other than some kind of
text. Linked data is based at least as much on convention as schema -
doing something
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
Oops, dcterms:title, does have a range -- nevermind.
Well, nevermind on that example, I still don't like URIs for
dcterms:description.
-Ross.
-Ross.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com
Oops, dcterms:title, does have a range -- nevermind.
-Ross.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure I would like running across dcterms:description with a URI as
its object. Not that dcterms:description has a defined range, but I
don't think most
Hi all,
Suppose I have RDF describing an object, and I would like some fairly
free-form human generating description about the object (let's say within
dcterms:description). Is it semantically acceptable to have XHTML nested
directly in this element or would this be considered uncouth for LOD?
You might consider the Content in RDF specification:
http://www.w3.org/TR/Content-in-RDF10/
which describes how to do this in a generic fashion, as opposed to
stuffing it directly into a string literal.
HTH
Rob
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Ethan Gruber ewg4x...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Ethan Gruber ewg4x...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Suppose I have RDF describing an object, and I would like some
fairly free-form human generating description about the object (let's say
within dcterms:description). Is it semantically acceptable to have XHTML
