;> question
>>>>>>> marks in this way (two question marks is probably feasible, but it
>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>> appear that one is). I don't believe that the ARK spec and HTTP URIs
>>>> are
>>>>>
er or
> >>>>> content
> >>>>> negotiation standards emerge.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ethan
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Phillips, Mark <
> >> mark.phill...@unt.edu>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >&g
ctions of ? and ??
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> our systems.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I remember the single ? being a bit of a problem to implement in our
>>>>>> system stack (Apache/mod_python/Django) and from what I can tell
n tell
> isn't
> > >>> possible with (Apache/mod_wsgi/Django) at all.
> > >>>
> > >>> The ?? inflection wasn't really a problem for us on either of the
> > >>> systems.
> > >>>
> > >>> From co
K, the issues
> around
> >>> supporting the ? and ?? inflections don't seem to be related to the
> >>> frameworks issues as other issues like commitment to identifiers, the
> >>> fact
> >>> that ARKs are being used in a redirection
mmitment to identifiers, the
>>> fact
>>> that ARKs are being used in a redirection based system like Handles, or
>>> the
>>> challenges of accessing the item metadata for items elsewhere in their
>>> system.
>>>
>>> I think having a standard
item metadata for items elsewhere in their
system.
I think having a standard set of request parameters or other url
conventions could be beneficial to the implementation of these features by
others.
Mark
____
From: Code for Libraries on behalf of
todd.d.robb...@gmail.c
.
>
> Mark
>
> From: Code for Libraries on behalf of
> todd.d.robb...@gmail.com
> Sent: Saturday, December 6, 2014 8:23 AM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Functional Archival Resource Keys
>
> This brief
ntation of these features by others.
Mark
From: Code for Libraries on behalf of
todd.d.robb...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, December 6, 2014 8:23 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Functional Archival Resource Keys
This brief exchang
This brief exchange on Twitter seems relevant:
https://twitter.com/abrennr/status/296948733147508737
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Mark A. Matienzo
wrote:
> Hi Ethan,
>
> I'm hoping Mark Phillips or one of his colleagues from UNT will respond,
> but they have implemented ARK inflections. For
Hi Ethan,
I'm hoping Mark Phillips or one of his colleagues from UNT will respond,
but they have implemented ARK inflections. For example, compare:
http://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth5828/
http://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth5828/?
http://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metap
I was recently reading the wikipedia article for Archival Resource Keys
(ARKs, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archival_Resource_Key), and there was a
bit of functionality that a resource is supposed to deliver that we don't
in our system, nor do any other systems that I've seen that implement ARK
URI
12 matches
Mail list logo
