Re: [CODE4LIB] Ranking factors for library resources: Who really uses what?

2011-02-16 Thread Cary Gordon
"generate artificial serendipity" Now my motto! Cary On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Simon Spero wrote: > There's another source of data for training library relevance ranking that I > don't think has been exploited much yet. > > (for academic libraries) > Searches against catalogs are usuall

Re: [CODE4LIB] Ranking factors for library resources: Who really uses what?

2011-02-16 Thread Simon Spero
There's another source of data for training library relevance ranking that I don't think has been exploited much yet. (for academic libraries) Searches against catalogs are usually intended to locate material to fill a specific information need. Often this information seeking results in circulati

Re: [CODE4LIB] Ranking factors for library resources: Who really uses what?

2011-02-16 Thread Ian Mulvany
In Mendeley we are using number of readers to rank search results on our catalog. Our search index is in solr. I don't have more fine grained details, but I could get them if people are interested. - Ian On 16 February 2011 14:21, LeVan,Ralph wrote: > As you pointed out, WorldCat does all sort

Re: [CODE4LIB] Ranking factors for library resources: Who really uses what?

2011-02-16 Thread LeVan,Ralph
As you pointed out, WorldCat does all sorts of tricky ranking. I believe there's a dashboard that they use for tuning the ranking. Library holdings count, term frequencies, availability, FRBR, and locality are all facets of that ranking. In OCLC Research we do practically nothing without some sor

Re: [CODE4LIB] Ranking factors for library resources: Who really uses what?

2011-02-15 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
A bunch of us are using Solr/lucene for discovery over library bibliographic records, which is based on the basic tf*idf weighting type algorithm, with a bunch of tweaks. So all of us doing that, and finding it pretty successful, are probably surprised to hear that this approach won't work on

Re: [CODE4LIB] Ranking factors for library resources: Who really uses what?

2011-02-15 Thread Dave Caroline
I wrote my own search engine for my system and thought long and hard about relevancy, in the end went for none! and display alphabetical. Dave Caroline On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Till Kinstler wrote: > There is a vivid discussion about relevance ranking for library > resources in discovery

[CODE4LIB] Ranking factors for library resources: Who really uses what?

2011-02-15 Thread Till Kinstler
There is a vivid discussion about relevance ranking for library resources in discovery interfaces in recent years. In articles, blog posts and presentations on this topic, again and again possible ranking factors are discussed beyond well known term statistic based methods like the vector space ret