You refer to Z39.50, maybe...
On 07/nov/2012, at 20.33, Kyle Banerjee wrote:
> In all fairness, SRU also is something I'd hope would fade out as it is
> based on an information retrieval model developed that saw its heydey
> decades ago...
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Karen Coyle wrote:
On Nov 7, 2012, at 2:33 PM, Kyle Banerjee wrote:
> In all fairness, SRU also is something I'd hope would fade out as it is
> based on an information retrieval model developed that saw its heydey
> decades ago...
Do you know of a better search/retrieve standard?
-Ross.
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 a
In all fairness, SRU also is something I'd hope would fade out as it is
based on an information retrieval model developed that saw its heydey
decades ago...
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> Owen,
>
> I think we owe it to future generations to make sure that they don't have
>
Owen,
I think we owe it to future generations to make sure that they don't
have to know MARC. It's beginning to feel like one of those really bad
horror films where the dead keep getting up and walking. I'm up for
driving a stake through its still-beating heart.
Imagine, just imagine, a worl
Thanks Karen - probably should have known that! That's the nice thing about
MARC - always some new thing to cope with :)
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936
On 6 Nov 2012, at 19:37, Karen Coyle wrote:
> T
The "9"s are available in all indicator positions for local use as
defined in the MARC record (not MARC21) spec. [1] So what is in the
MARC21 spec under a particular tag is the "non-local" values. I suspect
that most systems just ignore any '9's they encounter unless those are
defined as part o
According to the MARC spec, 035 doesn't support '9' as a valid indicator. My
very uneducated guess would be the invalid indicator is causing the underlying
system not to index it?
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6
Let's say I've defined these indexes in pqf.properties on the SRU server:
index.marc.020 = 1=7 # ISBN
index.marc.035:1 = 1=1211 # OCLC/utility number where first indicator is
non-blank
index.marc.100:1 = 1=1 # author where first indicator is non-blank
I can use the ISBN index to search for record
Hi all,
I'm having some difficulties pulling records by MARC fields with indicators via
SRU v1.1... and, not knowing where else to turn, I hope the good folks of the
CODE4LIB community can help. (If there is a more appropriate place to seek
assistance on this topic, please point me to it!)
Wha
