All --
The feedback I got Friday was that the idea is sound but the timing is not
great. I'm canceling today's scheduled virtual lightning talks and will
reschedule for the last week of April or the first week of May. I'll send out
another message when the date is set.
Peter
On Mar 28, 201
I also like this idea, and it also conflicts for my schedule, but I was
contemplating skipping my other commitment to attend this. Hadn't decided
for sure, as I was waiting to see a few of the Virtual LT talk titles that
signed up (hah!).
Also, I am a bit of a newcomer to code4lib, having never a
I agree with Luciano that the lead time was a bit short for me. Well,
maybe not specifically because it was short, but it does conflicts
with something else I have to do and I don't have time to reschedule.
I really like this idea and I hope it can be successful, so I hope
this message brought a ra
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Peter Murray wrote:
> So far no one has signed up to present on Monday and only one person has
> signed up to attend. It sounds like the idea of virtual lightning talks
> isn't going to fly. If you have feedback (e.g., not interesting, not enough
> lead time to
Hey, folks --
So far no one has signed up to present on Monday and only one person has signed
up to attend. It sounds like the idea of virtual lightning talks isn't going
to fly. If you have feedback (e.g., not interesting, not enough lead time to
prepare, wrong time of day/week/year), I'd ap
One of the highlights of the Code4Lib annual meeting is the “lightning talk”
rounds. A lightning talk is a fast-paced 5 minute talk on a topic of the
presenter’s choosing. They are usually scheduled on an ad-hoc,
first-come-first-served basis on the day of the event. They are an opportunity
to
