I hear Roy Tennant talked Chuck Norris' fists into not punching him in the
face. That's how smart Roy Tennant is.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Frumkin, Jeremy <
frumk...@u.library.arizona.edu> wrote:
> Is Roy Tennant smarter than Chuck Norris is tough?
>
> -- jaf
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On J
ERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Michele
R Combs
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 1:19 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Studying the email list (Charcuterie Spectrum)
I dunno, it's hard to imagine anything that's been sitting on a bar stool since
before I was born as being
@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Studying the email list (Charcuterie Spectrum)
I dunno, it's hard to imagine anything that's been sitting on a bar stool since
before I was born as being remotely attractive. But that might just be because
I'm old. Well, old-ish.
Michele
-O
Is Roy Tennant smarter than Chuck Norris is tough?
-- jaf
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 5, 2012, at 1:51 PM, "Roy Tennant" wrote:
> Roy Tennant is too smart to have an official position on this. Best to work
> it out yourselves. :-)
> Roy
>
> On Jun 5, 2012, at 1:06 PM, Ethan Gruber wrote:
>
>>
45 CFR 46.102(f)(2):
(f) Human subject means a living individual about whom an investigator
(whether professional or student) conducting research obtains
(1) Data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or
(2) Identifiable private information.
[. . .] Private information includes
Roy Tennant is too smart to have an official position on this. Best to work it
out yourselves. :-)
Roy
On Jun 5, 2012, at 1:06 PM, Ethan Gruber wrote:
> The begs the question, what is the official Roy Tennant position on baloney
> vs. bologna? May I suggest a viaf-like resource for food, in wh
On the internet, no one knows you're a dog.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Truitt, Marc wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 02:18 PM, Michele R Combs wrote:
>>
>> I dunno, it's hard to imagine anything that's been sitting on a bar stool
>> since before I was born as being remotely attractive.
>
>
> Hmm... so
On 06/05/2012 02:18 PM, Michele R Combs wrote:
I dunno, it's hard to imagine anything that's been sitting on a bar stool since
before I was born as being remotely attractive.
Hmm... sounds as though you've not ever lived with a Labrador Retriever!
Most Labs I've met would be in dog heaven at
I'd have to disagree. Clearly, IMHO, seitan is the vegan Seal of No
Approval Needed.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Kevin S. Clarke wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:55 PM, BWS Johnson
> wrote:
>
> >> Bacon == Seal of Approval
> >> Bologna == Seal of Disapproval
> >> Salami == Seal of
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Becky Yoose wrote:
> We need a meat that is disapproved of universally. May I suggest "pickled
> pig's ears that have been sitting in a jar on a bar counter since you've
> been born"?
There are cultural assumptions in this disapproval. I suggest you
retract this p
U] On Behalf Of Mark A.
Matienzo
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 4:17 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Studying the email list (Charcuterie Spectrum)
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Becky Yoose wrote:
> We need a meat that is disapproved of universally. May I suggest
>
On 06/06/12 06:11, Doran, Michael D wrote:
Without asking permission of the list, I hereby assign this new category of things
requiring OCLC oversight as "salami" on the charcuterie spectrum.
Bologna == Seal of Disapproval
There appears to be a typo here:
Soylent Green == Seal of Disappro
Perhaps spam spam spam spam spam spam spam baked beans egg and spam?
Michele
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Kevin
S. Clarke
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 4:02 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Studying the
I vote for worms. I go to the garden to eat them when nobody loves me and
everybody hates me
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Becky Yoose wrote:
> Chicken gizzards, when prepared right (fried), are a delicacy. While I am
> not a gizzard fan, many in my immediate and extended family are, so...
Chicken gizzards, when prepared right (fried), are a delicacy. While I am
not a gizzard fan, many in my immediate and extended family are, so...
We need a meat that is disapproved of universally. May I suggest "pickled
pig's ears that have been sitting in a jar on a bar counter since you've
been b
+1 Tempeh == Seal of No Approval Needed, though finding an appropriate
icon may be a challenge...
--
HARDY POTTINGER
University of Missouri Library Systems
http://lso.umsystem.edu/~pottingerhj/
https://MOspace.umsystem.edu/
"The bigger the smile you give, the bigger the smile you get. Works every
The begs the question, what is the official Roy Tennant position on baloney
vs. bologna? May I suggest a viaf-like resource for food, in which I may
prefer the baloney label while allowing my data to be cross-searchable with
bologna records? Is there an RDF ontology for this???
On Tue, Jun 5, 20
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:55 PM, BWS Johnson wrote:
>> Bacon == Seal of Approval
>> Bologna == Seal of Disapproval
>> Salami == Seal of No Approval Needed
>>
>
> This has some serious flaws. I'm concerned about the relationships
> between the desirability of the bespoke seals as they
Salvete!
> Without asking permission of the list, I hereby assign this new category of
> things requiring OCLC oversight as "salami" on the charcuterie
> spectrum.
>
> Bacon == Seal of Approval
> Bologna == Seal of Disapproval
> Salami == Seal of No Approval Needed
>
This has so
05, 2012 12:04 PM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Studying the email list
>
> Exactly the kind of observation that makes this list worth studying --
> Paul
>
> On 6/5/12 12:57 PM, Daniel Suchy wrote:
> > Folks: aren't we forgetting
Exactly the kind of observation that makes this list worth studying -- Paul
On 6/5/12 12:57 PM, Daniel Suchy wrote:
Folks: aren't we forgetting the first step? Do we even have OCLC's
permission?!
Sorry :)
Dan
On 6/5/12 9:52 AM, "Truitt, Marc" wrote:
On 06/04/2012 02:44 PM, Paul Orkiszewski
Folks: aren't we forgetting the first step? Do we even have OCLC's
permission?!
Sorry :)
Dan
On 6/5/12 9:52 AM, "Truitt, Marc" wrote:
>On 06/04/2012 02:44 PM, Paul Orkiszewski wrote:
>> the outcomes would be anonymous and there would be no e-mail harvest of
>> any kind, especially and specifi
On 06/04/2012 02:44 PM, Paul Orkiszewski wrote:
the outcomes would be anonymous and there would be no e-mail harvest of
any kind, especially and specifically any commercial harvesting. [...]
Eric Lease Morgan, the list admin, can provide an archive of the list,
but I wanted to check with all of
Wholeheartedly agree.
Simply asking permission implies whoever you're asking has more business
determining whether you have the right to do something than you do. It also
implies you expect them to offer an opinion. People who don't know what's
going on say "no" in such situations. The result is e
++
Mark N's comments made me wonder, "what kinds of things *don't* require
IRB approval?" Here's a link to a page with the US's HHS department,
Office for Human Research Protections.
http://1.usa.gov/OHRPchart
Nice little flowchart / decision tree. Looks like Paul's particular bit of
research w
They are public: https://listserv.nd.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A1=ind1206&L=CODE4LIB
Have at it.
While I fully support ethical research and even IRBs, we do everyone a
disservice by appealing to IRBs to approve things that don't require their
approval, even if we're just doing so to be "careful." It reminds
I think our list archives ought to be public, and ought ideally to be
available to anyone without even having to make an out of band request
to ELM. Are they not, can't you just download them from the web without
even having to ask? Either way, yes, anyone should be able to get the
archives to
I personally don't have any objections to this, and in fact, would be
interested to find out what you discover. Make sure you check with your IRB
to see if they require anything (sometimes even an anonymous survey can
require IRB approval) if you are considering publishing your results.
Also, if y
Hi all,
I'm interested in analyzing the list archives with a goal of studying
how concepts move through the list over time, the relationship (or
non-relationship) between discussions in the list and eventual
implementations and practices in the broader library community, the
zeitgeist over ti
29 matches
Mail list logo
