On Nov 6, 2014, at 5:17 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> Cynthia, it's been a while but I wanted to give you feedback...
>
> Ranking on importance based on library ownership and/or circulation is
> something that I've seen discussed but not implemented -- mainly due to the
> difficulty of gathering the
display on the ranking.
Stuff to do in my off-work time.
Cindy
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Karen
Coyle
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 5:18 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Wednesday afternoon reverie
Cynthia, it's been a while but I wanted to give you feedback...
Ranking on importance based on library ownership and/or circulation is
something that I've seen discussed but not implemented -- mainly due to
the difficulty of gathering the data from library systems. But it seems
like an obvious
So I'm deleting all the Bisac subject headings (650_7|2bisacsh) from our ebook
records - they were deemed not to be useful, especially as it would entail a
for-fee indexing change to make them clickable. But I'm thinking if we someday
have a discovery system, they'll be useful as a means for br
