Re: [CODE4LIB] followup on proxying Google Book Search, question on Shib/SAML

2009-08-10 Thread Till Kinstler
Eric Hellman schrieb: Exactly what I was looking for, but what I want to know, are these things actually used and implemented for real resource providers? We are running one Shibboleth Identity Provider, but don't have implemented something for users that would allow them to set their person

Re: [CODE4LIB] followup on proxying Google Book Search, question on Shib/SAML

2009-08-10 Thread Eric Hellman
Exactly what I was looking for, but what I want to know, are these things actually used and implemented for real resource providers? On Aug 10, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Till Kinstler wrote: Eric Hellman schrieb: I am in the process of looking at other technologies to see if there are alternative

Re: [CODE4LIB] followup on proxying Google Book Search, question on Shib/SAML

2009-08-10 Thread Till Kinstler
Eric Hellman schrieb: I am in the process of looking at other technologies to see if there are alternatives. Hence another question: Does anyone know of libraries that have done anything with "attribute release" in the context of SAML/Shibboleth? What do you mean by "have done anything..."?

[CODE4LIB] followup on proxying Google Book Search, question on Shib/SAML

2009-08-10 Thread Eric Hellman
Thanks to everyone who commented on my question regarding proxying Google Book Search. On looking into this further, it appears to me that current techniques for proxying would not be able to enhance privacy for Google Book Search once the provisions of the settlement agreement are implem