Re: [CODE4LIB] old stuff

2012-03-28 Thread Al Matthews
as a service). Thank you, -- Al Matthews, Software Dev, Atlanta University Center -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of David Uspal Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 5:53 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] old stuff Al, I'm

Re: [CODE4LIB] old stuff

2012-03-28 Thread Sam Kome
for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Al Matthews Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 6:09 AM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] old stuff That seems to me an excellent answer, especially since my question was too broadly set. Thank you. I think what still bothers

Re: [CODE4LIB] old stuff

2012-03-28 Thread Matthew Sherman
Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of David Uspal Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 5:53 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] old stuff Al, I'm not an archivist by trade, but I had some thoughts on the subject, (and the person who

[CODE4LIB] old stuff

2012-03-27 Thread Al Matthews
Hello. I have a local question that I will assume to be general: how do those of you involved in special collections and the like - especially in the event that those collections are born digital and perhaps not entirely recent - deal with issues of evaluation of digital assets? One difficult

Re: [CODE4LIB] old stuff

2012-03-27 Thread David Uspal
@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: [CODE4LIB] old stuff Hello. I have a local question that I will assume to be general: how do those of you involved in special collections and the like - especially in the event that those collections are born digital and perhaps not entirely recent - deal with issues of evaluation