DE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU<mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU>
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] separate list for discussing a separate list for jobs
Ha ha---yes! exactly.
On 5/6/14, 6:13 PM, "Joe Hourcle" wrote:
>On May 6, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Dan Chudnov wrote:
>
>> Is it time to reconsider: s
Ha ha---yes! exactly.
On 5/6/14, 6:13 PM, "Joe Hourcle" wrote:
>On May 6, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Dan Chudnov wrote:
>
>> Is it time to reconsider: should we start a separate list for "Job:"
>>postings? "code4lib-jobs", perhaps?
>
>I think the real question here is if we should have a separate list
On May 6, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Dan Chudnov wrote:
> Is it time to reconsider: should we start a separate list for "Job:"
> postings? "code4lib-jobs", perhaps?
I think the real question here is if we should have a separate list for
discussing if we need a separate list for jobs. I propose
'cod
