Karen, you should send this back to the Geek Feminism folks -- I am sure
they'd be interested in seeing your edits, and they also like to report on
orgs that have implemented such policies in general.
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Cary Gordon listu...@chillco.com wrote:
I prefer the tone and
Thanks, I'll try to rmember -- when we've finished -- I suspect we have
a ways to go.
kc
On 12/3/12 6:08 AM, Andreas Orphanides wrote:
Karen, you should send this back to the Geek Feminism folks -- I am sure
they'd be interested in seeing your edits, and they also like to report on
orgs that
I may have inadvertently logged a pull request when I made some minor edits to
you changes:
https://github.com/code4lib/antiharassment-policy/pull/20
First off, kcoyle++. I like the rethinking of the focus of the document. I
added a missing work and tweaked a few other words. The pull
I agree with removing the list of sanctions.
Cary
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Karen Coyle li...@kcoyle.net wrote:
Peter,
I removed the list of sanctions because it seemed unnecessarily ...punitive.
Sometimes, the whole incident may consist only of reminding someone that
their language
I did a somewhat radical edit of the policy. To me it sounded
heavy-handed, and I didn't think that we needed such in our community. I
also want to distinguish between bloopers that need correction and
active harassment. A lot of discriminatory language is unconscious but
still should be
kcoyle++
i like the way it merges clarity of commitment with positive tone.
-b
---
Birkin James Diana
Programmer, Digital Technologies
Brown University Library
birkin_di...@brown.edu
On Dec 2, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Karen Coyle li...@kcoyle.net wrote:
I did a somewhat radical edit of the
I prefer the tone and language in your version.
kcoyle++
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Karen Coyle li...@kcoyle.net wrote:
I did a somewhat radical edit of the policy. To me it sounded heavy-handed,
and I didn't think that we needed such in our community. I also want to
distinguish between
