I haven't used Castor for mixed content, but obviously, mixed content
is more difficult to map to Java types, even if you have a schema. I
probably wouldn't use Castor in those situations. Otherwise, it - or a
tool like it that can map schemata to Java types for automatic
parsing, generation, and v
I don't know if it's still the case, but I know a recent EAD project
that tried to use Castor said that it had problems with mixed content
models. -- Clay
On Feb 1, 2008, at 10:50 AM, Riley, Jenn wrote:
-Original Message-
I now need to read XML. Unlike indexing and doing OAI-PMH, ther
> -Original Message-
> > I now need to read XML. Unlike indexing and doing OAI-PMH, there are
> > a myriad of tools for reading and writing XML. I've done SAX before.
> > I think I've done a bit of DOM. If I wanted a straight-forward and
> > well-supported Java package that supported these
On Jan 27, 2008 5:40 PM, Eric Lease Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the most respected (useful, understandable) XML Java package?
>
> In a few fits of creative rage, I have managed to write my first Java
> programs. I can now index plain text files with Lucene and search the
> index. I
r
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Lease Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 11:40 PM
Subject: [CODE4LIB] xml java package
What is the most respected (useful, understandable) XML Java package?
In a few fits of creative rage, I have managed to writ
That supports both SAX and DOM or just that provides a good way of
working with XML? If I were making a recommendation for an XML/Java
library, I'd recommend XOM. There are converters from SAX and DOM to
XOM, but XOM is really a simpler (yet conformant) way of working with
XML.
http://xom.nu/
K
What is the most respected (useful, understandable) XML Java package?
In a few fits of creative rage, I have managed to write my first Java
programs. I can now index plain text files with Lucene and search the
index. I can parse MARC files with MARC4J, index them with Lucene,
and search the index
