shirt ++
--
Cary Gordon
The Cherry Hill Company
http://chillco.com
Exactly, vote taken. Done.
Preference was not even close.
-Wilhelmina
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Carol Bean wrote:
> No.
>
> Just no. Vote taken. Preferences noted. Done.
>
> Carol
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:50 AM, Graham Triggs wrote:
>
> > On 6 August 2012 13:19
mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
Friscia, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 7:46 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!
Second the motion to stop beating this dead horse.
___
Michael Friscia
Mana
Friscia, Michael
>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 7:46 AM
>
>> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
>
>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!
>
>>
>
>> Second the motion to stop beating this dead horse.
>
>>
>
>> __
brary & Programming Services
Yale University Library
(203) 432-1856
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Doran,
Michael D
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 9:17 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job post
Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Doran,
Michael D
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 9:17 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!
> Second the motion to stop beating this dead horse.
Dang, and I was already working on this
150]
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>
>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
>
>> Friscia, Michael
>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 7:46 AM
>
>> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
>
>> Subject: Re
half Of Carol
Bean
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 8:43 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!
No.
Just no. Vote taken. Preferences noted. Done.
Carol
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:50 AM, Graham Triggs wrote:
> On 6 August 20
No.
Just no. Vote taken. Preferences noted. Done.
Carol
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:50 AM, Graham Triggs wrote:
> On 6 August 2012 13:19, Ed Summers wrote:
>> 150 people responded about whether jobs.code4lib.org posting should
>> come to the discussion list:
>>
>>yes: 132
On 6 August 2012 13:19, Ed Summers wrote:
> 150 people responded about whether jobs.code4lib.org posting should
> come to the discussion list:
>
> yes: 132
> no: 10
> who cares: 8
>
> 93% in support or agnostic seems to be a good indicator that the
> postings should continue to come to
150 people responded about whether jobs.code4lib.org posting should
come to the discussion list:
yes: 132
no: 10
who cares: 8
93% in support or agnostic seems to be a good indicator that the
postings should continue to come to the list for now.
//Ed
Actually, you don't even need to filter on subject line (which might
filter out something like this thread). Jobs posted through
jobs.code4lib.org (vs an individual) all come from j...@code4lib.org
so all you have to do is filter emails from that specific email.
Like most, I think it's great to ha
> For those who dislike the current ratio of job postings to regular
> content the solution seems clear: start posting more flamewar inducing
> questions. It's quite easy
There's also the option of implementing these high tech things known as
"email filters." They've only been around a couple
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Ed Summers wrote:
>
>
> As Dan Chudnov pointed out in his code4lib keynote this year, the
> library/archive profession is in the midst of a pretty big
> upheaval/transformation. So, the other goal of jobs.code4lib.org is to
> help document the skills and jobs that a
Think before you
> >>post.
> >>
> >>For me, it doesn't bother me at all. If you don't like it, it just takes
> >>a click to delete it. You will not see the hiring phenomenon stays on
> >>peak all the time.
> >>
> >>Kelly
> &g
7;t bother me at all. If you don't like it, it just takes
>>a click to delete it. You will not see the hiring phenomenon stays on
>>peak all the time.
>>
>>Kelly
>>
>>-Original Message-----
>>From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.ED
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Barbara Cormack
wrote:
> I would vote for including more information in the postings, as some have
> come through without any details about the job or the hiring institution, or
> links. Usually a little searching turns this up, but not always.
Just so I understan
@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!
Too many job postings? I think there are fields where people would
kill to have this problem. :-)
--Mark
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Ed Summers wrote:
Honestly, I'm surprised this hasn't come up sooner :-) In t
-Original Message-
> > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Chen, Janey
> > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 8:49 AM
> > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!
> >
> > I am wi
gt;Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 8:49 AM
>To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
>Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!
>
>I am with you on this! Actually, it is encouraging to see that there are
>many job openings in this field. And the job descriptions give people a
>sense of wh
g phenomenon stays on peak all
> the time.
>
> Kelly
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Chen,
> Janey
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 8:49 AM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB
ys on peak all
the time.
Kelly
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Chen,
Janey
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 8:49 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!
I am with you on this!
I think the "flood" of job postings is a good problem to have. --ELM
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Moynihan, Terry
wrote:
> I can't understand why this would be an issue in a profession (librarian)
> that is very tiny compared to most. I also can't understand why it would be a
> problem when 50% of college graduates can't get any job let alone one in
> their f
rry
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 9:35 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!
I can't believe that after being on this board for 4+ years, this is the first
time I'm going to write, and it has nothing to do with code.
I can't understand why
:17 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!
Honestly, I'm surprised this hasn't come up sooner :-) In the interests of
"science" I've created a little poll to indicate whether you think the job
postings should be sent to the code
Most of them come from the Shortime application that Ed Summers has
been working on and posted about. It's over at jobs.code4lib.org.
I don't really mind them. I've thought about just filtering out the
emails ^Job: in the subject, but haven't actually bothered yet.
Jon Gorman
On Wed, Aug 1, 201
I made the same observation recently but decided to simply set up a
filter. Pushing the jobs postings into a separate list seems like a
worse solution.
--jay
PS, in a big-picture sense, it seems like a good problem to have. I
mean, the number of postings is really remarkable!
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012
Perhaps it's because it's summer. Not much going on but staff searches...
Aaron Collier
Library Academic Systems Analyst
California State University, Fresno - Henry Madden Library
559.278.2945
acoll...@csufresno.edu
http://www.csufresno.edu/library
- Original Message -
From: "Nat
29 matches
Mail list logo
