After I sent the other mail, he added this:
[0:30] I'm not sure.. what I'm talking about isn't a BIND problem,
it's just a weakness in the DNS protocol, period. theres nothing that can
stop it except the next-generation protocol(DNSSEC, cryptographicly signed
packets)
In a log below, with pWr, he claims there is a bug in the new code .. I'm
pasting his conversation below along with the info on a person who
supposedly had utilized the bug.
Bob
khaki is [EMAIL PROTECTED] * khaki
*** Looking up microsoft.com
*** Resolved microsoft.com to 207.46.197.102
/useri
Please send all replies to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not to me personally. I'm
not the only one that can help you here, and I do tend to be very busy, so
you're more likely to get a fast response if you do so.
> So how would I fix that. what should I change the group users to? I am kind
> of having
> I hope this is word wrapped... I tried to set it... HTML is turned off
Yeah, it's wrapped, thanks :)
> for this email also. I edited 5 files to create u2.10.11.beta.PartyNet.16.
> They were ircd_policy.h, ircd_defs.h, patchlevel.h, s_err.c, and s_auth.c.
> Would any of those files have anythi
