yup, me too.
"Yeah well BEAM this up *PAL*!"
- Original Message -
From: Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:23 am
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] *!*@* ban abusability
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 08:45:36PM +0200, Alexander Maassen wrote:
> > Solution:
> > Finally ge
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Kev wrote:
> We could make the maximum number of bans in a banlist be proportional to
> the number of users on the channel in question. Anyone have any immediate
> reactions to this?
Other than rewarding large channels during peak times while penalizing them
off-peak, when
> Problem:
> *!*@* masks strongly mess up channels when used in kick/ban
>
> Example:
> - Get level 100 in a channel (so you can ban)
The very fact that this requires level 100 on a channel means that it is not
IMO a
coding issue. It is the responsibility of the 400+ users, and thus
ultimately of
daaave wrote:
> OK, I'm about to show the extent of my (lack of) knowledge of X,
> but...I assume the issue that you're talking about is that if you issue
> "/msg x unban *!*@*", then it will not only remove that ban, but also
> any ban that's a subset of it (which in this case is _all_ of them)
* Alexander Maassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-29 20:45:36 +0200]:
> Problem:
> *!*@* masks strongly mess up channels when used in kick/ban
>
> Example:
> - Get level 100 in a channel (so you can ban)
> - Issue a ban on *!*@* at level 20
>
> Result:
> Flood away, coz noone can op himself since
Welcome to the latest IFIRC.com Bulletin. It can be viewed at
http://www.ifirc.com/bulletin/news2.htm
In this issue:-
What has been happening at IFIRC
IFIRC Server Listing Requirements
Opportunities to show your talents
Recent Message Board Problems
Thanks
IRC Federation
__
To unsub
