Radium said:
"Basically, for the servers, the user never left the channel (thus does not
lose the @). The client-server protocol would not change and for the users
on the channel, it would look like a real PART, JOIN, MODE +o sequence."
Basically like '/mode nick +x' does at the moment onl
Ahhh right...I see what you mean...it should appear to come from the users
server because the source of the message is sptr->user->server->name. Very
odd indeed!
Oh well doesn't really matter now as it would appear that u2.10.11 won't do
that if as you said you change the sptr to an &me.
David
-
I'm probably way off base here but I think it might be to do with the fact
that jbuf->jb_source in joinbuf_init (channel.c) gets filled with the
contents of sptr from m_join (joinbuf_init(&create, sptr, cptr,
JOINBUF_TYPE_CREATE, 0, TStime());) which I think is the senders name and as
the sender w
