> i have an idea
> one should have a seperate hard length and soft length
>
> the hard length would be the maximum length a server could handle
>
> the soft length would be the maximum length a client directly connected to a
> server would be allowed to use
>
> so you could increase the hard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 02 Aug 2002 5:23 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [2] this assumes that you have solved the trivial problem of getting all
> your serveradmins awake and on IRC at the same time.
Getting them online at all in some cases would be a mir
first and when it was increaed
accross the entire net you would increase the soft lengths
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] New Feature lines purpose
>Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 17:23:21 +0100
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from [66.134.137.28] b
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 11:35:30AM -0400, Kev wrote:
> > I'am thinking moving NICKLEN, USERLEN, HOSTLEN, ACCOUNTLEN, REALLEN,
> > PASSWDLEN, AWAYLEN, TOPICLEN, NETWORK, URL_CLIENTS to ircu feature lines.
>
> the *LEN #define's are very particular--they must be exactly the same
> across the entire
> I'am thinking moving NICKLEN, USERLEN, HOSTLEN, ACCOUNTLEN, REALLEN,
> PASSWDLEN, AWAYLEN, TOPICLEN, NETWORK, URL_CLIENTS to ircu feature lines.
the *LEN #define's are very particular--they must be exactly the same
across the entire network and must not be changed during the server's
operation.
Quoting The legend of the darkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fellow ircu hackers,
>
> I'am thinking moving NICKLEN, USERLEN, HOSTLEN, ACCOUNTLEN, REALLEN,
> PASSWDLEN, AWAYLEN, TOPICLEN, NETWORK, URL_CLIENTS to ircu feature lines.
>
> The target ircu will be .12 (pre-alpha)
>
> What is your opini
Fellow ircu hackers,
I'am thinking moving NICKLEN, USERLEN, HOSTLEN, ACCOUNTLEN, REALLEN,
PASSWDLEN, AWAYLEN, TOPICLEN, NETWORK, URL_CLIENTS to ircu feature lines.
The target ircu will be .12 (pre-alpha)
What is your opinion about this?
Forward-Port Status:
I have ported the new stats code fro
