[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
confidentiality as regards this pending transaction.
Ewps, looks like the cat is out of the bag now. ;-)
--Bleep
DR ALI AHMED
LAGOS, NIGERIA.
A very good day to you.
We have an immediate business proposal that involves US$ 21,320,000.00
(Twenty-one Million Three Hundred and Twenty Thousand United States Dollars) which we
will like to invest under your custody.
Once I receive a message from you notify
Talyn helped Ace with xcmds.txt & .hlp and is currently creating an update
of those 2 files :)
(PS: As usual I forget to cc to coder-com@ :))
> Hi,
>
> At 18:15 15/02/2003, you wrote:
> >Talyn (doc writer of cservice's .hlp file) had the idea to change one of
> X's
>
> he wrote all of them ? or
Hi,
At 18:15 15/02/2003, you wrote:
>Talyn (doc writer of cservice's .hlp file) had the idea to change one of X's
he wrote all of them ? or just compiled them into .hlp ? ;P
>replies for the INFO command. It should return the language name instead of
>the language id the username is using.
GMTA
Talyn (doc writer of cservice's .hlp file) had the idea to change one of X's
replies for the INFO command. It should return the language name instead of
the language id the username is using.
--
volta
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++
Bitte lächeln! Fotogalerie online mit
Currently, ACCOUNT implements a single, monolithic security domain. We
would like to extend it to support multiple security domains, plus allow
a serial number to be associated with a particular account and allow a
user to be logged out of an account. This entails two protocol changes.
* ACCOUN
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Isomer wrote:
> in 2.10.11 we pass the full salt to crypt(3), so if the system uses md5,
> then ircu should too.
That relies on the system using MD5 though...with the patch I have
atm, the MD5 routines are included in the source tree, so it always uses
MD5 regardless
> On Sat, 11 May 2002, Bas wrote:
>
> > proposal MD5+salt password, feel free to comment on this
>
> I'm toying around with doing this right now, I have a patch for
> plain MD5 atm, just needs changing to salt the MD5.
>
in 2.10.11 we pass the full salt to crypt(3), so if the system uses
On Sat, 11 May 2002, Bas wrote:
> proposal MD5+salt password, feel free to comment on this
I'm toying around with doing this right now, I have a patch for
plain MD5 atm, just needs changing to salt the MD5.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
proposal MD5+salt password, feel free to comment on this
2 bytes salt + 16 bytes MD5 -> 18 bytes
(P10) base64 encode to 24 characters
10 matches
Mail list logo
