Re: [Coder-Com] re: status command

2001-09-10 Thread Py Fivestones
The idea here is to protect channels right? A good way to protect channels are to also protect them from adding a wrong user name via a typo. If it's easy to implement, why not do it? If it's too costly resource wise then "we" can say "it's not our problem it's the channel manager's problem" Isn't

[Coder-Com] re: status command

2001-09-10 Thread Alex Dawson, The Duck of Death
So just do a mass remuser. If you were legitimately added, we wouldn't do anything if you did. At 12:40 AM -0500 10/09/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I Agree there, > >In the past I have had turkish channels adding me as 450 + in there >channels without my concent , and then when there is trouble

[Coder-Com] re: status command

2001-09-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I Agree there, In the past I have had turkish channels adding me as 450 + in there channels without my concent , and then when there is trouble there they say "Well simba is 450 here" and I look quite foolish. Would be nice to have some acceptence like stoney said Simba