On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 12:39:26PM +1100, Ken Foskey wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 12:13 +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> > On 3 November 2011 12:02, Ken Foskey wrote:
> > >> This is NOT a email scammer call, it is a business that is emailing and
> > >> wants their emails to be 'as valid as possible'
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 12:13 +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 3 November 2011 12:02, Ken Foskey wrote:
> >> This is NOT a email scammer call, it is a business that is emailing and
> >> wants their emails to be 'as valid as possible' before delivery.
>
> Why do a separate prior check?
>
> Sending wi
On 3 November 2011 12:02, Ken Foskey wrote:
>> This is NOT a email scammer call, it is a business that is emailing and
>> wants their emails to be 'as valid as possible' before delivery.
Why do a separate prior check?
Sending with a few dead addresses shouldn't have any real cost. Then
later yo
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 00:11 +1100, Ken Foskey wrote:
> I am working on an email validation routine and there is a Java site
> that I am talking to that needs a complete email validation routine.
> Does anyone know of a project that handles complete validation in Java
> like specified in:
>
> http:
I am working on an email validation routine and there is a Java site
that I am talking to that needs a complete email validation routine.
Does anyone know of a project that handles complete validation in Java
like specified in:
http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2010/11/how-to-verify-if-an-email-addres
