On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:36:56 +0200
Florian Forster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 05:46:24PM +0700, Anh K. Huynh wrote:
> > I see the following messages from collectd:
> >
> > > illegal attempt to update using time 1285669914 when last update
> > > time is 1285669915
>
> > What's ki
This COUNTER->DERIVE does the trick. Transition script complete,
thanks for all your help.
b.
On 29 September 2010 20:15, Bostjan Skufca wrote:
> Hey, by my calculations in six hours I should receive a reply with
> even easier solution to all issues mentioned and maybe some other ones
> too. :)
By my experience separate collectd daemons are possible. I am
compiling it from scratch and all it needs besides the installed files
(binaries etc. ) is config file, pid file and potentially unix socket
file. Now if you create 2 separate configs which both point to
/var/lib/collectd (example) but e
+1 from me too.
I'd even ask for a different collection interval per instance, e.g.
maybe a "df" change on /home or /boot is less important to check on
every second than a "df" change on /var/log.
While we are on this topic - until this gets implemented - would it be
possible to work around this
+1 for this feature
It could really help with IO "hell" also.
Nicolas: maybe you should currently apply some of the generic plugins
(exec, libperl, java) and collect the actual data only every 360th
time (if you use 10s interval and want to collect this specific item
only once every hour).
b.
Hi,
I recently came across collect and was impressed by its functionality and
modular design. Great work!
There is just one piece missing, which actually would be very important for me
to make use of it: A possibility to specifiy intervals on a per-plugin basis.
There are some counters which I
Hey, by my calculations in six hours I should receive a reply with
even easier solution to all issues mentioned and maybe some other ones
too. :)
Serious business below. :)
On 29 September 2010 17:56, Florian Forster wrote:
> Hi Bostjan, Mariusz and everybody else ;)
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 0
Hi Bostjan, Mariusz and everybody else ;)
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 02:47:08PM +0200, XANi wrote:
> Dnia 2010-09-29, śro o godzinie 03:09 +0200, Bostjan Skufca pisze:
> > Maybe it's time to make a script for automated dump/change obviously
> > invalid data to NaN/import of rrds.
What's obvious to y
Dnia 2010-09-29, śro o godzinie 03:09 +0200, Bostjan Skufca pisze:
> Maybe it's time to make a script for automated dump/change obviously
> invalid data to NaN/import of rrds.
>
> Anyway, it is indeed COUNTER in my RRD files.
> Do you know how why it was not DERIVE specified at rrd creation?
>
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
The host-resource mib has the following OID for processor usage:
host.hrDevice.hrProcessorTable.hrProcessorEntry.hrProcessorLoad
But since we have 2 processors in the windows machine, the windows SNMP
service is returning the following OIDs for the 2 processor
10 matches
Mail list logo