potiuk edited a comment on pull request #11276:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11276#issuecomment-704068686
FY: This is even nicer. I could not see it reliably working in my fork, but
I see that it nicely works in Airflow.
The "Status of the Image Build" checks are also
potiuk commented on pull request #11276:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11276#issuecomment-704068686
FY: This is even nicer. I could not see it reliably working in my fork, but
I see that it nicely works. The "Status of the Image Build" checks are also
showing up now directly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-3607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17208513#comment-17208513
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-3607:
-
yuqian90 commented on pull request #
yuqian90 commented on pull request #11010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11010#issuecomment-704065719
> @yuqian90 you will need this as well: #7503
Thanks for pointing out. I'm not using the features fixed in #7503 myself so
it didn't affect me. However, you are right i
TobKed commented on a change in pull request #11287:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11287#discussion_r500037926
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/bigquery.py
##
@@ -1443,6 +1445,12 @@ def get_job(
job = client.get_job(job_id=job_id, projec
potiuk opened a new pull request #11292:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11292
Github Actions deprecated the set-env action due to moderate security
vulnerability they found.
https://github.blog/changelog/2020-10-01-github-actions-deprecating-set-env-and-add-path-comma
kishvanchee edited a comment on pull request #11277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11277#issuecomment-703783997
I just noticed. In tests it is named as `test_trigger_dagrun_operator_conf`
and `test_trigger_dagrun_operator_templated_conf`. Should those be changed to
`test_trig
jacobmhoffman commented on a change in pull request #11285:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11285#discussion_r500019774
##
File path: tests/upgrade/rules/test_airflow_macro_plugin_removed.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) und
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #11291:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11291#issuecomment-704020784
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
This is an automate
rajeshkatkarnice opened a new issue #11291:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11291
**Apache Airflow version**:
**Kubernetes version (if you are using kubernetes)** (use `kubectl version`):
**Environment**:
- **Cloud provider or hardware c
nullhack edited a comment on pull request #9464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9464#issuecomment-703541914
Thank you, yes you're right. They're failing because the test assume a
binary string `b'container log'`
One of the modifications of this PR is changing this to a d
nullhack edited a comment on pull request #9464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9464#issuecomment-703541914
Thank you, yes you're right. They're failing because the test assume a
binary string `b'container log'`
One of the modifications of this PR is changing this to a d
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #11290:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11290#issuecomment-704006597
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
This is an automate
srthok opened a new issue #11290:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11290
**Apache Airflow version**: 1.10.9
**Environment**:
- **Cloud provider or hardware configuration**: AWS
- **OS** (e.g. from /etc/os-release): Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS
- **Kernel** (e
atalimekhian opened a new issue #11289:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11289
**Apache Airflow version**:
**Kubernetes version (if you are using kubernetes)** (use `kubectl version`):
**Environment**:
- **Cloud provider or hardware confi
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #11289:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11289#issuecomment-703999010
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
This is an automate
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #11090:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11090#issuecomment-703998825
[The Build Workflow
run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/290596969) is cancelling
this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static checks$
KIRY4 edited a comment on pull request #8745:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8745#issuecomment-703981497
Hello! I'm using stable helm chart (image: 1.10.12-python3.6) and when I
tried to install python-ldap using extraPipPackage I got following:
unable to execute 'g
KIRY4 commented on pull request #8745:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8745#issuecomment-703981497
Hello! I'm using stable helm chart (image: 1.10.12-python3.6) and when I
tried to install python-ldap using extraPipPackage I got following:
--
unable to execute 'gcc':
dyi1 commented on issue #8160:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8160#issuecomment-703936612
@anirudhbagri Could you give me details as to what the root cause of your
issue was and how you fixed it? I'm currently experiencing the same issue and I
think it would help a lot.
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
dimberman pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from c51016b Add LocalToAzureDataLakeStorageOperator (#10814)
add 4847460 Add CeleryKubernetesExecutor to helm
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
dimberman pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from c51016b Add LocalToAzureDataLakeStorageOperator (#10814)
add 4847460 Add CeleryKubernetesExecutor to helm
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
dimberman pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from c51016b Add LocalToAzureDataLakeStorageOperator (#10814)
add 4847460 Add CeleryKubernetesExecutor to helm
dimberman merged pull request #11288:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11288
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
dimberman opened a new pull request #11288:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11288
Users of the CeleryKubernetesExecutor will require both
Celery and Kubernetes features to launch tasks.
This PR will also serve as the basis for integration tests for this
executor
ashb commented on a change in pull request #10956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10956#discussion_r499883416
##
File path: airflow/models/pool.py
##
@@ -91,7 +96,15 @@ def slots_stats(session: Session = None) -> Dict[str,
PoolStats]:
pools: Dict[str, P
ashb commented on a change in pull request #10956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10956#discussion_r499882907
##
File path: airflow/models/dag.py
##
@@ -1573,34 +1680,28 @@ def create_dagrun(self,
@classmethod
@provide_session
-def bulk_sync_to_db(c
ashb commented on a change in pull request #10956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10956#discussion_r499878674
##
File path: airflow/utils/sqlalchemy.py
##
@@ -141,3 +142,107 @@ def skip_locked(session: Session) -> Dict[str, Any]:
return {'skip_locked': Tru
nikste commented on issue #7907:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/7907#issuecomment-703882074
Sorry, this somehow drowned in other messages.
So, I have a DAG and some specified input, and i expect a certain output. I
want to run all operators end to end.
Currently I'm
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
turbaszek pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 93475e9 Single/Multi-Namespace mode for helm chart (#11034)
add c51016b Add LocalToAzureDataLakeStorageOpe
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
turbaszek pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 93475e9 Single/Multi-Namespace mode for helm chart (#11034)
add c51016b Add LocalToAzureDataLakeStorageOpe
turbaszek merged pull request #10814:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10814
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
turbaszek commented on pull request #9464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9464#issuecomment-703861860
I would be in favor of 2. + deprecation warning. I think we should return
strings. @feluelle @mik-laj any opinions?
-
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #10956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10956#discussion_r499841037
##
File path: airflow/jobs/scheduler_job.py
##
@@ -1714,53 +1321,158 @@ def _run_scheduler_loop(self) -> None:
)
bre
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #10956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10956#discussion_r499840548
##
File path: airflow/jobs/scheduler_job.py
##
@@ -556,12 +556,15 @@ def execute_callbacks(
:param session: DB session.
"""
ashb commented on a change in pull request #10956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10956#discussion_r499834162
##
File path: airflow/models/dag.py
##
@@ -1939,6 +2099,37 @@ def deactivate_deleted_dags(cls, alive_dag_filelocs:
List[str], session=None):
ashb commented on a change in pull request #10956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10956#discussion_r499833094
##
File path: airflow/models/dagrun.py
##
@@ -494,12 +542,13 @@ def verify_integrity(self, session: Session = None):
session.add(ti)
ashb commented on a change in pull request #10956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10956#discussion_r499833303
##
File path: airflow/models/dagrun.py
##
@@ -313,14 +360,16 @@ def update_state(self, session: Session = None) ->
List[TI]:
:rtype ready_tis: li
ashb commented on a change in pull request #10956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10956#discussion_r499832547
##
File path: airflow/jobs/scheduler_job.py
##
@@ -1705,62 +1305,216 @@ def _run_scheduler_loop(self) -> None:
loop_duration = loop_end_time -
ashb commented on pull request #10956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10956#issuecomment-703848887
The "The job has been cancelled by another workflow." message is slightly
confusing -- I'll look at updating that. In this case it's cancelled this PR,
because the Build Image wo
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #10956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10956#issuecomment-703845760
[The Build Workflow
run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/289987522) is cancelling
this PR. The job has been cancelled by another workflow.
---
ashb commented on a change in pull request #10956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10956#discussion_r499826337
##
File path: airflow/jobs/scheduler_job.py
##
@@ -1714,53 +1321,158 @@ def _run_scheduler_loop(self) -> None:
)
break
ashb commented on a change in pull request #10956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10956#discussion_r499826539
##
File path: airflow/jobs/scheduler_job.py
##
@@ -1714,53 +1321,158 @@ def _run_scheduler_loop(self) -> None:
)
break
XD-DENG commented on pull request #11196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11196#issuecomment-703836194
Will further proceed once we have more clarity on the Scheduler HA feature
(changing some common files).
This
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #10956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10956#issuecomment-703834310
[The Build Workflow
run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/289987522) is cancelling
this PR. The job has been cancelled by another workflow.
---
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #10838:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10838#issuecomment-703833344
[The Build Workflow
run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/290013570) is cancelling
this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static checks$
ivica-k commented on a change in pull request #11227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11227#discussion_r499802779
##
File path: airflow/providers/amazon/aws/transfers/redshift_to_s3.py
##
@@ -104,29 +107,50 @@ def __init__( # pylint: disable=too-many-arguments
ashb commented on a change in pull request #11189:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11189#discussion_r499800190
##
File path: airflow/www/security.py
##
@@ -520,18 +560,23 @@ def merge_pv(perm, view_menu):
def update_admin_perm_view(self):
"""
drsantos20 commented on a change in pull request #11283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11283#discussion_r499791981
##
File path: setup.py
##
@@ -65,12 +64,6 @@ class CleanCommand(Command):
description = "Tidy up the project root"
user_options = [] # typ
rootcss commented on issue #11161:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11161#issuecomment-703810947
@mik-laj Shall I pick this one up?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
ashb commented on a change in pull request #11158:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11158#discussion_r499784748
##
File path: airflow/cli/commands/role_command.py
##
@@ -41,3 +39,259 @@ def roles_create(args):
appbuilder = cached_app().appbuilder # pylint: disa
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #11227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11227#discussion_r499783147
##
File path: airflow/providers/amazon/aws/transfers/redshift_to_s3.py
##
@@ -104,29 +107,50 @@ def __init__( # pylint: disable=too-many-arguments
jhtimmins commented on a change in pull request #11189:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11189#discussion_r499777685
##
File path: airflow/cli/cli_parser.py
##
@@ -1228,6 +1228,12 @@ class GroupCommand(NamedTuple):
func=lazy_load_command('airflow.cli.comman
jhtimmins commented on a change in pull request #11189:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11189#discussion_r499776966
##
File path: airflow/www/security.py
##
@@ -520,18 +560,23 @@ def merge_pv(perm, view_menu):
def update_admin_perm_view(self):
"""
jhtimmins commented on a change in pull request #11189:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11189#discussion_r499776424
##
File path: airflow/www/security.py
##
@@ -320,33 +317,75 @@ def get_accessible_dags(self, user_actions, user,
session=None):
for perm
ivica-k commented on pull request #11227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11227#issuecomment-703793262
Does CI need to be triggered again because of cancelled checks? If so, how?
:)
This is an automated message f
turbaszek commented on issue #11282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11282#issuecomment-703792725
@nathadfield #11287 I think this should do, WDYT?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To re
ashb commented on a change in pull request #11075:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11075#discussion_r499775503
##
File path: airflow/www/views.py
##
@@ -393,6 +393,7 @@ def health(self):
@expose('/home')
@has_access
+@permission_name()
Review commen
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #11277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11277#issuecomment-703792547
[The Build Workflow
run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/289866879) is cancelling
this PR. The job has been cancelled by another workflow.
---
nathadfield commented on issue #11282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11282#issuecomment-703789894
Totally agree!
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
turbaszek commented on issue #11282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11282#issuecomment-703789283
@nathadfield I can push a simple fix and then we can improve it... better
done than perfect 😄
This is an automa
nathadfield commented on issue #11282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11282#issuecomment-703788869
I understand. Its not critical for us right now as we'll just continue to
use the current operators. Perhaps this is something for the next round of
backports then?
---
turbaszek commented on issue #11282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11282#issuecomment-703787636
> @turbaszek Extending the timestamp - perhaps to millisecond - would
probably fix it but I feel it would be better overall if there was a consistent
methodology for creating the
nathadfield commented on issue #11282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11282#issuecomment-703786851
@turbaszek Extending the timestamp - perhaps to millisecond - would probably
fix it but I feel it would be better overall if there was a consistent
methodology for creating the
kishvanchee commented on pull request #11277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11277#issuecomment-703783997
I just noticed. In tests it is named as `test_trigger_dagrun_operator_conf`
and `test_trigger_dagrun_operator_templated_conf`. Should those be changed to
`test_trigger_dag
turbaszek edited a comment on issue #11282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11282#issuecomment-703779936
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHu
nathadfield commented on issue #11282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11282#issuecomment-703783010
Not sure how you want to categorise it. Yes, all the old operators use a
random id.
This came about because I'm trying to use the new operators in existing
production D
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
dimberman pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from a33a919 Switched to Run Checks for Building Images. (#11276)
add 93475e9 Single/Multi-Namespace mode for h
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
dimberman pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from a33a919 Switched to Run Checks for Building Images. (#11276)
add 93475e9 Single/Multi-Namespace mode for h
dimberman merged pull request #11034:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11034
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
turbaszek commented on issue #11282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11282#issuecomment-703779936
Is this a bug or request feature? I think previously all operators used a
random job_id, right?
This is an autom
turbaszek opened a new pull request #11287:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11287
Previously the job_id was always automatically generated but in
refactor this was lost.
Closes: #11282
Closes: #11280
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
nathadfield commented on issue #11280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11280#issuecomment-703772922
Well, perhaps this is something that I shouldn't have done early on, but
we've specified a DAG version as part of the DagID using a '.'. Not had any
problems with this until n
saisiddhant12 commented on issue #11280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11280#issuecomment-703766096
> Btw. I'm not sure if using `.` in dag_id is the best idea. The dot is
special for subdags if I'm not mistaken
yes, it creates a sub-dag if we use . between parent & c
turbaszek commented on issue #11280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11280#issuecomment-703764813
Btw. I'm not sure if using `.` in dag_id is the best idea. The dot is
special for subdags if I'm not mistaken
T
nathadfield commented on issue #11282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11282#issuecomment-703763320
@potiuk We're more than happy to give it a try but we've just got to find
the time.
This is an automated messa
turbaszek commented on issue #11280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11280#issuecomment-703762921
Or should we build the string and the use the following code with added `.`?
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/a33a91951b731f1a5496be08e47d503527382968/airflow/providers/g
turbaszek edited a comment on issue #11280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11280#issuecomment-703762921
Or should we build the string and then use the following code with added `.`?
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/a33a91951b731f1a5496be08e47d503527382968/airflow/pro
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #11285:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11285#discussion_r499744010
##
File path: tests/upgrade/rules/test_airflow_macro_plugin_removed.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under o
eladkal edited a comment on pull request #11209:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11209#issuecomment-703760379
I'm not sure what is the issue with the black static test. It doesnt happen
on my local fork.
This is
potiuk commented on issue #11282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11282#issuecomment-703761047
And @nathadfield -> maybe you or someone from your team would like to fix it
? I am sure we can help with having out the details and review.
---
potiuk commented on issue #11282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11282#issuecomment-703760483
cc: @turbaszek - WDYT ?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
eladkal commented on pull request #11209:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11209#issuecomment-703760379
I'm not sure how to fix the black static test. It doesnt happen on my local
fork.
This is an automated messag
potiuk commented on issue #11280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11280#issuecomment-703759481
I think it we already do similar thing elsewhere in Airflow - we are
replacing . with __dot__ I believe. It is in "views.py" - and it is mostly to
prevent some subdag matching. I do
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #11285:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11285#discussion_r499741937
##
File path: airflow/upgrade/rules/airflow_macro_plugin_removed.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #11285:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11285#discussion_r499741673
##
File path: airflow/upgrade/rules/airflow_macro_plugin_removed.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
saisiddhant12 commented on issue #11280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11280#issuecomment-703759064
@nathadfield @potiuk
I would like to give it a shot, I can think introducing macro like
ts_no_dash with a hyphen separation of each version should solve the problem, or
prakshalj0512 opened a new issue #11286:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11286
**Apache Airflow version**:
**Kubernetes version (if you are using kubernetes)** (use `kubectl version`):
```Client Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"19", GitVersion:"v1.19.2",
G
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #11285:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11285#discussion_r499740657
##
File path: airflow/upgrade/rules/airflow_macro_plugin_removed.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #11285:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11285#discussion_r499739588
##
File path: airflow/upgrade/rules/airflow_macro_plugin_removed.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
potiuk commented on pull request #10956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10956#issuecomment-703756198
Unfortunately, there is no "rerun failed job up to x times" feature in
GitHub and this part is a bit outside of our control.
--
potiuk commented on pull request #10956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10956#issuecomment-703755603
And "re-running" is not happening at all - if the build image fails (like in
this case transiently - on pushing to the Github registry) then it is treated
as any other failure
potiuk commented on pull request #10956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10956#issuecomment-703754865
You need to restart the workflow or commit --amend and push --force.
This is an automated message from the Apac
potiuk commented on pull request #10956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10956#issuecomment-703754413
@ashb "Same "unknown blob" if you follow the link and look at the failed
job. - I got it also today several times with my personal account so it seems
like a transient instabil
turbaszek commented on pull request #10838:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10838#issuecomment-703753991
This may help:
```
git fetch --all
git rebase apache/master
git cherrypick 8a8bee4
git log
```
If you see in log your commit then do `git push --force-wit
turbaszek edited a comment on pull request #10838:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10838#issuecomment-703753991
This may help:
```
git fetch --all
git reset --hard apache/master
git cherrypick 8a8bee4
git log
```
If you see in log your commit then do `git pus
OmairK edited a comment on pull request #9597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9597#issuecomment-703751945
> @OmairK @mik-laj Any updates here?
Waiting for @mik-laj's review on the approach I followed.
OmairK commented on pull request #9597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/9597#issuecomment-703751945
> @OmairK @mik-laj Any updates here?
Waiting for @mik-laj's review on the approach I followed,
This is an
potiuk commented on pull request #11276:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11276#issuecomment-703748893
> I think we should merge this one and adjust with the time being. I'm sorry
but I don't have enough capacity to fully understand the problem now
Yep. This is something I
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from baa980f When sending tasks to celery from a sub-process, reset signal
handlers (#11278)
add a33a919 Switched
1 - 100 of 348 matches
Mail list logo
