jhtimmins commented on pull request #11362:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11362#issuecomment-714273877
@ashb ok I added the docs for the website. Lemme know what you think of this
format.
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11362/files#diff-5821e749f4956a14f3d0aa939985a542
mpermana commented on pull request #11592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11592#issuecomment-714269597
@ashb Looks like now only 1 failing check and thats not due to my change:
Run
pydocstyle
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #11738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11738#issuecomment-714268553
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/321459509)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks$,^Buil
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #11659:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11659#issuecomment-714268561
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/321459509)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks$,^Buil
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #11592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11592#issuecomment-714268548
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/321459509)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks$,^Buil
potiuk commented on pull request #11719:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11719#issuecomment-714258732
After Tomek's experience with telling people to make PRs to 1-10-test I
added the mising explanation on v1-10-test/v1-10-stable branches in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/bl
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #11719:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11719#issuecomment-714257579
Fine for me :). I think maybe it would be great to document the process we
have on that, this way we would not have to make any personal assumptions. For
sure - as learn
potiuk commented on pull request #11719:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11719#issuecomment-714257579
Fine for me :). I think maybe it would be great to document the process we
have on that, this way we would not have to make any personal assumptions. For
sure - as learning we
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 9150330 Add Google Cloud Memorystore Memcached Operators (#10121)
add 1da8379 Fix static checks after merging
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 9150330 Add Google Cloud Memorystore Memcached Operators (#10121)
add 1da8379 Fix static checks after merging
potiuk merged pull request #11737:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11737
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
potiuk commented on pull request #11738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11738#issuecomment-714249970
cc: @bbossy
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
potiuk opened a new pull request #11738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11738
There was a typo in the original file when review was made in
the #11529 but apparently this typo was still left in one place
and as the result, providers have not been installed in the
master
potiuk commented on issue #11695:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11695#issuecomment-714248166
RGH. I thought I fixed it but apparently onle the ENV!
THANKS A LOT ! This is a total bummer !
-
potiuk edited a comment on issue #11695:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11695#issuecomment-714248166
RGH. I thought I fixed it but apparently only the ENV!
THANKS A LOT ! This is a total bummer !
--
shivanshs9 commented on a change in pull request #10987:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10987#discussion_r509895817
##
File path: airflow/www/extensions/init_views.py
##
@@ -73,8 +73,12 @@ def init_plugins(app):
appbuilder = app.appbuilder
for view in p
bbossy commented on issue #11695:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11695#issuecomment-714236354
@potiuk I tracked this down to a typo in the
[Dockerfile](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/172820db4d2009dd26fa8aef4a864fb8a3d7e78d/Dockerfile#L212):
**ROVIDERS** instea
ayush-san commented on issue #8467:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8467#issuecomment-714227433
@joshzana They have made the required changes for Airflow 2.0
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/UPDATING.md#breaking-change-in-oauth.
---
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #10254:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10254#issuecomment-714205645
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/321244722)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks$,^Buil
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #11736:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11736#discussion_r509853949
##
File path: airflow/providers/hashicorp/secrets/vault.py
##
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ class VaultBackend(BaseSecretsBackend, LoggingMixin):
def __init_
mik-laj commented on pull request #10254:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10254#issuecomment-714199119
I rebased this chaange to latest master. When it's green, I'll merge the
change.
This is an automated message
mik-laj commented on issue #9708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9708#issuecomment-714197157
The assumptions from the first post have been met - each provider has
coverage of at least 75%. Therefore, I consider the ticket **completed**. We
can do more type annotations, but
mik-laj closed issue #9708:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9708
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the s
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #11736:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11736#discussion_r509853949
##
File path: airflow/providers/hashicorp/secrets/vault.py
##
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ class VaultBackend(BaseSecretsBackend, LoggingMixin):
def __init_
mik-laj opened a new pull request #11737:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11737
This one didn't have the latest rules for static checks.
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10121
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
G
fhoda opened a new pull request #11736:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11736
In some cases organizations may not want to use Vault for Airflow Variable,
but instead for Airflow Connections only. The proposed PR makes Variables
optional in Vault when using Vault as the Alternat
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #11735:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11735#issuecomment-714185463
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/321164733)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks$,^Buil
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #11592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11592#issuecomment-714185471
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/321164733)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks$,^Buil
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-master by this
push:
new f2931c2 Updating
mpermana removed a comment on pull request #11592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11592#issuecomment-714173747
@ashb any idea why files that i dont change failed test:
airflow/providers/sftp/hooks/sftp.py
This i
mpermana commented on pull request #11592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11592#issuecomment-714173747
@ashb any idea why files that i dont change failed test:
airflow/providers/sftp/hooks/sftp.py
This is an aut
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kamilbregula pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from b9d677c Add type hints to aws provider (#11531)
add 9150330 Add Google Cloud Memorystore Memcached Ope
mik-laj commented on pull request #11735:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11735#issuecomment-714173277
CC: @tanjinP
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kamilbregula pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 9150330 Add Google Cloud Memorystore Mem
mik-laj opened a new pull request #11735:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11735
Some tasks cannot be performed simultaneously, resulting in instability.
Sometimes this DAG was successful but sometimes unsuccessful.
Before:
![before-redis](https://user-images.githubuse
mik-laj closed issue #8286:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8286
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the s
mik-laj merged pull request #10121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10121
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
mik-laj commented on pull request #10121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10121#issuecomment-714170148
Only one small problem. Besides, everything is beautiful and works.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12058428/96808717-a599f380-1419-11eb-86af-b39628e670c6.png";>
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #10121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10121#discussion_r509831495
##
File path:
airflow/providers/google/cloud/example_dags/example_cloud_memorystore.py
##
@@ -229,3 +251,80 @@
failover_instance >> delete_instanc
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #10121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10121#discussion_r509831495
##
File path:
airflow/providers/google/cloud/example_dags/example_cloud_memorystore.py
##
@@ -229,3 +251,80 @@
failover_instance >> delete_instanc
mik-laj commented on issue #11297:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11297#issuecomment-714086523
@potix2 @mlgruby @scrambldchannel I assigned you to this ticket 🐱
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kamilbregula pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from ae791e1 Fix formatting errors introduced in #11720 (#11733)
add b9d677c Add type hints to aws provider
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kamilbregula pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new b9d677c Add type hints to aws provider
mik-laj merged pull request #11531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11531
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
yuqian90 commented on issue #10686:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10686#issuecomment-714033588
Hi @KulykDmytro, the original issue reported in #10686 and #10725 has been
fixed in #10751 and will be released in the release of airflow.
I assume `latest_only` is a `Lates
potix2 commented on pull request #11531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11531#issuecomment-714015305
@mik-laj It's ready for merging. I overlooked that static checking was
successful because `CI Build / Static checks: basic checks only` was skipped.
-
mik-laj opened a new pull request #11734:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11734
If we send signal SIGTERM - 15 several times to airflow webserver, then
gunicorn can become [defunct
process](https://askubuntu.com/questions/201303/what-is-a-defunct-process-and-why-doesnt-it-get
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 6c3f435 Refactor "loading" state of DAGs view to remove visual jank
(#11725)
add ae791e1 Fix formatting e
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 6c3f435 Refactor "loading" state of DAGs view to remove visual jank
(#11725)
add ae791e1 Fix formatting e
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #11730:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11730#issuecomment-713922544
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/320872220)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks$,^Buil
kaxil merged pull request #11733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11733
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
joshzana commented on issue #8467:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8467#issuecomment-713901916
Any update on this bug? It appears to only affect usage of airflow within
the official docker image, as the unofficial puckel/docker image does not hit
the bug with version 1.10.10
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #11732:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11732#issuecomment-713899295
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/320797006)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks$,^Buil
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #11730:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11730#issuecomment-713899288
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/320797006)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks$,^Buil
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #11699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11699#issuecomment-713899285
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/320797006)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks$,^Buil
ashb commented on pull request #10632:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10632#issuecomment-713897242
Hmmm all the K8s tests failing is a worrying sign. Could you rebase and see
if that fixes it?
This is an automat
ashb commented on issue #9976:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9976#issuecomment-713895994
Likely improved massive in Airflow 2.0.0 alpha by the AIP-15 work
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Serv
ashb commented on pull request #11733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11733#issuecomment-713892758
Merging now to unblock other PRs.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mes
ashb opened a new pull request #11733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11733
I think we merged this when GH Actions hadn't created the jobs yet.
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #11730:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11730#issuecomment-713890339
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/320768388)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks$,^Buil
ashb opened a new pull request #11732:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11732
It was possible to "block" the scheduler such that it would not schedule or
queue tasks for a dag if you triggered a DAG run when the DAG was already at
the max active runs.
This approach works
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 1fb3c28 Add support for setting ciphers for SFTPHook (#11720)
add 6c3f435 Refactor "loading" state of DAGs
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 1fb3c28 Add support for setting ciphers for SFTPHook (#11720)
add 6c3f435 Refactor "loading" state of DAGs
ashb commented on pull request #11730:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11730#issuecomment-713883409
@mik-laj I changed it just after you reviewed, so wanted to see if you're
still happy.
Instead of creating a new `State.terminal` set, I adjusted the existing
`State.finis
kaxil merged pull request #11725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11725
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
mik-laj commented on issue #11073:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11073#issuecomment-713883150
I think we need to add unit tests to prevent regression.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #11693:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11693#issuecomment-713882972
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/320741472)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks$,^Buil
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #11592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11592#issuecomment-713882978
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/320741472)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks$,^Buil
ashb commented on a change in pull request #11730:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11730#discussion_r509700963
##
File path: airflow/utils/state.py
##
@@ -114,6 +114,16 @@ def color_fg(cls, state):
have been interrupted; in any case, it is no longer running.
mik-laj commented on issue #11366:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11366#issuecomment-713878165
Can you update your first post to match the template? In particular, I am
interested in the Airflow version.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/airflow/master/.github/ISSU
kaxil opened a new issue #11731:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11731
**Apache Airflow version**: 1.10.12
**What happened**:
Using the following `pod_mutation_hook` failed in 1.10.12 (it should have
been backwards-compatible with 1.10
OmairK commented on issue #11073:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11073#issuecomment-713872651
@jhtimmins is this issue still relevant after this
[change](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10594/commits/bbd08a3c529f7af40842b80c42793b775071743e)?
KulykDmytro edited a comment on issue #10686:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10686#issuecomment-713869568
Anyhow behavior not corresponds with [documentation
](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/stable/concepts.html?highlight=branch#latest-run-only)
Even using a code snippet
KulykDmytro edited a comment on issue #10686:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10686#issuecomment-713869568
Anyhow behavior not corresponds with [documentation
](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/stable/concepts.html?highlight=branch#latest-run-only)
Even using a code snippet
KulykDmytro commented on issue #10686:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10686#issuecomment-713869568
Anyhow behavior not corresponds with [documentation
](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/stable/concepts.html?highlight=branch#latest-run-only)
Even using a code snippet mention
ashb commented on a change in pull request #11730:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11730#discussion_r509684070
##
File path: airflow/utils/state.py
##
@@ -114,6 +114,16 @@ def color_fg(cls, state):
have been interrupted; in any case, it is no longer running.
ashb commented on a change in pull request #11730:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11730#discussion_r509682544
##
File path: airflow/models/dagrun.py
##
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ def update_state(
ti.task = dag.get_task(ti.task_id)
unfinished_tasks
ashb commented on a change in pull request #11730:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11730#discussion_r509682312
##
File path: airflow/jobs/scheduler_job.py
##
@@ -1473,7 +1473,7 @@ def _do_scheduling(self, session) -> int:
func.count(TI.execution_dat
ashb opened a new pull request #11730:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11730
This was messing up the "max_active_runs" calculation, and this fix is a
"hack" until we add a better approach of adding a queued state to
DagRuns -- at which point we don't even have to do this ca
ashb commented on pull request #11730:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11730#issuecomment-713867721
/cc @mjpieters
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log o
KulykDmytro edited a comment on issue #10686:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10686#issuecomment-713855548
Another one example on 1.10.12 shows same behavior (join task skipping) for
downstream tasks despite of any `trigger_rule` set (`all_done`, `none_failed`,
`none_failed_o
KulykDmytro edited a comment on issue #10686:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10686#issuecomment-713855548
Another one example on 1.10.12 shows same behavior (join task skipping) for
downstream tasks despite of any `trigger_rule` set (`all_done`, `none_failed`,
`none_failed_o
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #10987:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10987#discussion_r509670185
##
File path: airflow/www/extensions/init_views.py
##
@@ -73,8 +73,12 @@ def init_plugins(app):
appbuilder = app.appbuilder
for view in plug
KulykDmytro edited a comment on issue #10686:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10686#issuecomment-713855548
Another one example on 1.10.12 shows same behavior (join task skipping) for
downstream tasks despite of any `trigger_rule` set (`all_success`, `all_done`,
`none_failed`,
KulykDmytro edited a comment on issue #10686:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10686#issuecomment-713855548
Another one example on 1.10.12 shows same behavior for downstream tasks
despite of any `trigger_rule` set (`all_success`, `all_done`, `none_failed`,
`none_failed_or_skip
KulykDmytro commented on issue #10686:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10686#issuecomment-713855548
Another one example on 1.10.12 shows same behavior for downstream task
```
import datetime as dt
from airflow.models import DAG
from airflow.operators.dummy_oper
mik-laj commented on pull request #8818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8818#issuecomment-713853591
@khyurri Do you need help? I will gladly do it for you.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servic
ashb commented on issue #11633:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11633#issuecomment-713853131
I'm re-working that query in question a bit as part of fixing #11582, I'll
encorporate this fix in there and add a test case for it
--
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #11726:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11726#discussion_r509663487
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/dataflow.py
##
@@ -268,9 +271,8 @@ def _check_dataflow_job_state(self, job) -> bool:
rai
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #11726:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11726#discussion_r509662589
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/dataflow.py
##
@@ -268,9 +271,8 @@ def _check_dataflow_job_state(self, job) -> bool:
rai
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #11726:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11726#discussion_r509662589
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/dataflow.py
##
@@ -268,9 +271,8 @@ def _check_dataflow_job_state(self, job) -> bool:
rai
ashb commented on pull request #11719:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11719#issuecomment-713850732
Personally I've been treating v1-10-stable like we treat master -- i.e.
don't rebase without a very good reason.
sreev edited a comment on issue #11366:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11366#issuecomment-713244902
the logs seems piped into themselves.
here is a sample logs lines from running `% airflow scheduler` in my local
on mac.
```
[2020-10-20 18:47:29,294] {logging_mix
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kamilbregula pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 950c16d Retry requests in case of error in Google ML Engine Hook
(#11712)
add 1fb3c28 Add support for
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kamilbregula pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 950c16d Retry requests in case of error in Google ML Engine Hook
(#11712)
add 1fb3c28 Add support for
sreev edited a comment on issue #11366:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11366#issuecomment-713244902
the logs seems piped into themselves.
here is a sample logs lines from running `% airflow scheduler` in my local
on mac.
```
[2020-10-20 18:47:29,294] {logging_mix
sreev edited a comment on issue #11366:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11366#issuecomment-713244902
the logs seems piped into themselves.
here is a sample logs lines from running `% airflow scheduler` in my local
on mac.
```
[2020-10-20 18:47:29,294] {logging_mix
ashb commented on a change in pull request #11693:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11693#discussion_r509624100
##
File path:
chart_tests/test_templates/git_sync_scheduler/git-sync-existing-claim.yaml
##
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #11720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11720#issuecomment-713847099
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!
This is an automated message from the
mik-laj merged pull request #11720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11720
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
1 - 100 of 329 matches
Mail list logo
