natejenkins21 commented on issue #9975:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9975#issuecomment-739468040
Same issue here. Causing a lot of issues for my backfills...
This is an automated message from the Apache Git S
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #12847:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12847#issuecomment-739453629
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might decide
htgeis commented on pull request #12825:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12825#issuecomment-739450965
> > These variables maybe change in the future and it's better not to do
hard code in the connection.
>
> This doesn't convince me: anything can change, including the non
vikramkoka opened a new pull request #12847:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12847
Updated to reference 1.10.14 instead of 1.10.13.
Also added an additional step to install the upgrade check scripts,
instead of expecting them to be part of the Airflow bridge release.
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a change to tag nightly-master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
*** WARNING: tag nightly-master was modified! ***
from c1cd504 (commit)
to 1257b5c (commit)
from c1
jhtimmins opened a new pull request #12846:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12846
Currently, when a user is logged out, the `DAGs` link shows in the menu and
the `Not Logged In` warning shows if the user has been directed to `/login`
from any other page.
:
:type keepalive_interval: int
"""
+conn_na
noelmcloughlin commented on issue #11965:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11965#issuecomment-739440890
> when i use pip3 install cattrs==1.0.0.
Beware of cattrs 1.n.n hell with Python 3.9 (i.e. archlinux).
- https://github.com/Tinche/cattrs/issues/100
- htt
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #12558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12558#discussion_r536928903
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/bigquery.py
##
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ class BigQueryHook(GoogleBaseHook, DbApiHook):
conn_name_attr = '
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #12558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12558#discussion_r536928785
##
File path: airflow/providers/facebook/ads/hooks/ads.py
##
@@ -55,9 +55,15 @@ class FacebookAdsReportingHook(BaseHook):
"""
+conn_name_attr
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #12558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12558#discussion_r536928736
##
File path: airflow/providers/facebook/ads/hooks/ads.py
##
@@ -55,9 +55,15 @@ class FacebookAdsReportingHook(BaseHook):
"""
+conn_name_attr
kaxil commented on pull request #12800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12800#issuecomment-739440244
ping @ashb @XD-DENG @potiuk @turbaszek
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #12558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12558#discussion_r536928191
##
File path: airflow/providers/apache/sqoop/hooks/sqoop.py
##
@@ -52,6 +52,11 @@ class SqoopHook(BaseHook):
:type properties: dict
"""
+c
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #12558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12558#discussion_r536927987
##
File path: airflow/providers/amazon/aws/hooks/s3.py
##
@@ -103,6 +103,9 @@ class S3Hook(AwsBaseHook):
:class:`~airflow.providers.amazon.aws.ho
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #12558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12558#discussion_r536927837
##
File path: airflow/providers/amazon/aws/hooks/s3.py
##
@@ -103,6 +103,9 @@ class S3Hook(AwsBaseHook):
:class:`~airflow.providers.amazon.aws.ho
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #12558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12558#discussion_r536927719
##
File path: airflow/providers/amazon/aws/hooks/s3.py
##
@@ -103,6 +103,9 @@ class S3Hook(AwsBaseHook):
:class:`~airflow.providers.amazon.aws.ho
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #11964:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11964#issuecomment-739439758
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/403294483)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks,^Build
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #12558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12558#discussion_r536927484
##
File path: airflow/models/connection.py
##
@@ -266,11 +266,19 @@ def rotate_fernet_key(self):
def get_hook(self):
"""Return hook based
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #12558:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12558#discussion_r536927195
##
File path: UPDATING.md
##
@@ -52,6 +52,11 @@ assists users migrating to a new version.
## Master
+### SparkJDBCHook default connection
+
+For Spar
noelmcloughlin edited a comment on issue #11965:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11965#issuecomment-739439092
> The new version of PIP has MANY problems and broke a lot of other projects.
I never use PyPi pip because OS distributions provide stable `python-pip,
python2-
noelmcloughlin edited a comment on issue #11965:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11965#issuecomment-739439092
> The new version of PIP has MANY problems and broke a lot of other projects.
I never use PyPi pip because OS distributions provide stable `python-pip,
python2-
kaxil commented on issue #12832:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12832#issuecomment-739439100
Maybe you can use Hash from PyPI:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow/1.10.13/#copy-hash-modal-7de14478-7b22-42f1-b870-f0aa8bf1b3ce
```
bb637f95a2aef7b2f7d622ecd
noelmcloughlin commented on issue #11965:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11965#issuecomment-739439092
> The new version of PIP has MANY problems and broke a lot of other projects.
I never use PyPi pip because OS distributions provide stable `python-pip,
python2-pip, py
kaxil commented on pull request #11260:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11260#issuecomment-739438605
@jhtimmins Can you take a look at this please?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To resp
kaxil commented on pull request #12733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12733#issuecomment-739438331
Just catching up here, good work @msumit . I was thinking we could add this
kind of backends as example_redis_xcom_backend similar to our example_dags
which we can use for the d
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 4a02e0a Don't emit first_task_scheduling_delay metric for only-once
dags (#12835)
add 1257b5c Fix doc pre
kaxil merged pull request #10962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10962
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #11223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11223#discussion_r536919803
##
File path: airflow/upgrade/rules/stat_name_handler_not_supported.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under o
ashb commented on issue #12783:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12783#issuecomment-739434493
I've worked out the problem -- it's caused by the switch to Serialized DAGs
only in HA scheduler.
I have a hacky-one line fix. and am working on a better fix now.
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-master by this
push:
new fbd525a Updating
brighton1101 commented on a change in pull request #12467:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12467#discussion_r536909117
##
File path: airflow/config_templates/config.yml
##
@@ -2053,3 +2053,13 @@
type: string
example: ~
default: "NamedHivePartiti
vikramkoka commented on issue #12838:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12838#issuecomment-739425513
Thanks @potiuk I am really glad you added this to the installation
instructions too!
This is an automated mess
ashb edited a comment on pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842#issuecomment-739419341
Hmmm 60 vs 61 now.
61 looks like the "right" value too
```ipython console
In [2]: len(setup.PROVIDERS_REQUIREMENTS)
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 37b2679 Make `airflow --help` run five times quicker (#12836)
add 4a02e0a Don't emit first_task_scheduling_delay
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from df9493c Add sensors section to describe different modes of sensors
(#12803)
add 37b2679 Make `airflow --help` r
ashb merged pull request #12835:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12835
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to t
ashb merged pull request #12836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12836
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to t
ashb commented on pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842#issuecomment-739419341
Hmmm 60 vs 61 now.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please lo
XD-DENG edited a comment on pull request #12825:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12825#issuecomment-739408758
It's good to have flexibility only to certain extent. Being too flexible may
lead to unexpected confusion eventually.
I look forward to opinions from other commit
XD-DENG opened a new pull request #12845:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12845
We notice sometimes the Action job `"Label PRs when reviewed"` is triggered
for multiple times, even if there is only one approval
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12816#issuecomment-739023107
XD-DENG commented on pull request #12825:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12825#issuecomment-739408758
It's good to have flexibility only to certain extend. Being too flexible may
lead to unexpected confusion eventually.
I look forward to opinions from other committers as
XD-DENG commented on pull request #12825:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12825#issuecomment-739407314
> These variables maybe change in the future and it's better not to do hard
code in the connection.
This doesn't convince me: anything can change, including the non-envv
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from e9b2ff5 Add notes about PIP 20.3 breaking Airflow installation
(#12840)
add df9493c Add sensors section t
kaxil closed issue #10816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10816
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the s
kaxil merged pull request #12803:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12803
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
rootcss commented on issue #12081:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12081#issuecomment-739389387
Hi @humbledude. This seems to be working fine for me. Could you please share
a snippet of DAG object and your PapermillOperator.
--
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #12803:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12803#issuecomment-739389309
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might decide
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #11223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11223#issuecomment-739364858
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and tak
kenluck2001 commented on a change in pull request #11223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11223#discussion_r536880288
##
File path: airflow/upgrade/rules/stat_name_handler_not_supported.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842#issuecomment-739364221
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/402967051)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks,^Build
ashb commented on pull request #12836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12836#issuecomment-739345505
> I'd prefer to solve it differently, but pragmatically, this is easiest way
now.
I would also like that importing modules had less "side-effects", but...
I think we
potiuk commented on pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842#issuecomment-739336225
Ah I see - that's why there was a "providers list" first and "backportable"
later :). i see now that you got the same command for both 0-> my proposal was
just replacing the se
ashb commented on pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842#issuecomment-739336021
K, so the issue was previously, the "list of providers" was always got from
"normal", which we then checked against files on disk. We then always reset the
list to backport.
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842#discussion_r536869364
##
File path: scripts/in_container/run_prepare_provider_packages.sh
##
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ LIST_OF_DIRS_FILE=$(mktemp)
cd "${AIRFLOW_SOURCES}/airflow/pr
turbaszek commented on issue #12577:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12577#issuecomment-739335720
@ManiBharataraju I would say that you can do `python_operator >>
external_sensor` and pass to the sensor whatever execution date you want. In my
opinion this serves 100% of cases
ashb commented on pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842#issuecomment-739335693
(I ran non-backport locally, the sed works fine.)
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To re
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842#issuecomment-739335427
> I think that's now failing _exactly because_ papermill is not backportable.
Nope. I thin this is the changed sed. It did not even hit the changed it
yet. The few
ashb commented on pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842#issuecomment-739335605
> > I think that's now failing _exactly because_ papermill is not
backportable.
>
> Nope. I thin this is the changed sed.
```
ERROR! Some folders from providers p
potiuk commented on pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842#issuecomment-739335427
> I think that's now failing _exactly because_ papermill is not backportable.
Nope. I thin this is the changed sed.
-
potiuk commented on pull request #12836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12836#issuecomment-739334640
I'd prefer to solve it differently, but pragmatically, this is easiest way
now.
This is an automated message f
ashb commented on pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842#issuecomment-739334563
Oh lol.
> ERROR! Some folders from providers package are not defined
> Please add them to
dev/provider_packages/prepare_provider_packages.py:
I thin
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 12c1fe2 Increments number of providers detected and stop failing
(#12841)
add e9b2ff5 Add notes about PIP 20
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842#issuecomment-739334395
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/402917006)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks,^Build
potiuk merged pull request #12840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12840
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #12840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12840#issuecomment-739334179
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not m
ashb commented on pull request #12844:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12844#issuecomment-739333474
https://github.com/apache/airflow/runs/1504028479?check_suite_focus=true of
an example
This is an automa
ashb opened a new pull request #12844:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12844
If a MySQL 8 test fails it will dump the logs, and we will see a lot of
errors like this:
```
mbind: Operation not permitted
mbind: Operation not permitted
mbind: Operation not permitt
ashb commented on pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842#issuecomment-739332826
> Yours is nicer. I kill mine :)
Thanks, it took me rather longer though! (been poking at this for an hour)
---
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842#issuecomment-739332721
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and tak
potiuk closed pull request #12843:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12843
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
potiuk opened a new pull request #12843:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12843
Backportable packages were overwriting list of packages with
the backportable packages.
Not yet restoring the check until we see a few successes.
---
**^ Add meaningful desc
ashb commented on pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842#issuecomment-739332453
Lets see if this passes the provider test
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
ashb commented on a change in pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842#discussion_r536849964
##
File path: scripts/in_container/run_prepare_provider_packages.sh
##
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ LIST_OF_DIRS_FILE=$(mktemp)
cd "${AIRFLOW_SOURCES}/airflow/prov
ashb commented on a change in pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842#discussion_r536849510
##
File path: scripts/in_container/run_prepare_provider_packages.sh
##
@@ -34,12 +34,21 @@
REFACTOR_PROVIDER_PACKAGES_PY="${AIRFLOW_SOURCES}/dev/provider_
ashb commented on a change in pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842#discussion_r536849366
##
File path: scripts/in_container/run_prepare_provider_packages.sh
##
@@ -63,7 +72,6 @@ if [[ -z "$*" ]]; then
echo
exit 1
fi
-
ashb opened a new pull request #12842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12842
This was using the backport list when trying to build the normal list,
leading to papermill package not getting built.
I have re-introduced the exit removed in #12841, and also done a little
ashb commented on pull request #12841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12841#issuecomment-739331370
Spotted the problem. Fix coming.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #12840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12840#issuecomment-739331242
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/402888329)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks,^Build
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #12836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12836#issuecomment-739329946
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/402707859)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks,^Build
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 1f4152b Fix docstring for models.Variable.get() (#12828)
add 12c1fe2 Increments number of providers detected
potiuk merged pull request #12841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12841
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
potiuk commented on pull request #12841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12841#issuecomment-739329170
I'll merge it for now to unblock the master. and will fix it as the next
step.
This is an automated message fr
ashb commented on pull request #12841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12841#issuecomment-739328927
It's something to do with papermill missing -- at least in the example I saw.
This is an automated message from t
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #12841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12841#issuecomment-739328891
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and tak
potiuk opened a new pull request #12841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12841
There seem to be a flaky number of providers returned by
integration test.
For now exit will be disabled but we will observe the flakiness.
---
**^ Add meaningful descriptio
potiuk opened a new pull request #12840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12840
Part of #12838
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst#pull-request-guid
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #12837:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12837#issuecomment-739325769
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/402844832)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks,^Build
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #12836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12836#issuecomment-739325772
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/402844832)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks,^Build
potiuk opened a new pull request #12839:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12839
Part of #12838
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst#pull-request-guid
potiuk opened a new issue #12838:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12838
I am adding this issue to keep track of the on-going problems with new PIP
20.3 released 30th of November.
There are multiple issues with the new PIP that makes it breaks with
Airflow's dependency
potiuk edited a comment on issue #12824:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12824#issuecomment-739321527
Why no, not really @ashb :).
@spence95 Can you please downgrade PIP to 20.2.4 ? Tjhis most likely the
issue with new PIP 20.3 rolled out on Nov 30th.
There ar
potiuk closed issue #12824:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12824
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
potiuk commented on issue #12824:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12824#issuecomment-739321527
Why no, not really @ashb . Can you please downgrade PIP to 20.2.4 ? Tjhis
most likely the issue with new PIP 20.3 rolled out on Nov 30th.
There are many issues (at least for
potiuk commented on pull request #12837:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12837#issuecomment-739315616
I've found rather simple and nice way of passing the discovered
"hidden/renamed fields" to the javascript form. I do it via Hidden Field in
FAB. This Is really simple and strai
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xddeng pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 1dcd3e1 Add support for extra links coming from the providers (#12472)
add 1f4152b Fix docstring for models.V
XD-DENG merged pull request #12828:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12828
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #12836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12836#issuecomment-739314544
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/402737123)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks,^Build
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #12766:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/12766#issuecomment-739314539
[The Workflow run](https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/402737123)
is cancelling this PR. It has some failed jobs matching ^Pylint$,^Static
checks,^Build
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
