potiuk commented on a change in pull request #19010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19010#discussion_r731386158
##
File path: Dockerfile.ci
##
@@ -400,6 +400,16 @@ LABEL org.apache.airflow.distro="debian" \
org.opencontainers.image.title="Continuous Integration
potiuk commented on pull request #19042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19042#issuecomment-946250086
> Sorry, I think I got you confused. I mean that they should be in this pull
request. Close the others and add the changes to this one
Yeah. Agre e those are better toget
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #19042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19042#issuecomment-946250086
> Sorry, I think I got you confused. I mean that they should be in this pull
request. Close the others and add the changes to this one
Yeah. Agree those are better
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17485:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17485#issuecomment-946259391
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank y
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #16166:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16166#issuecomment-946259427
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank y
uranusjr closed pull request #16166:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16166
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-uns
uranusjr commented on pull request #16166:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16166#issuecomment-946272873
Continuing in #18042.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spec
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #18042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18042#discussion_r731410907
##
File path: airflow/config_templates/config.yml
##
@@ -1358,6 +1358,14 @@
example: "/path/to/my_html_content_template_file"
default: ~
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #18042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18042#discussion_r731411083
##
File path: airflow/config_templates/config.yml
##
@@ -1358,6 +1358,14 @@
example: "/path/to/my_html_content_template_file"
default: ~
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19010#issuecomment-946275408
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and tak
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19057#issuecomment-946277243
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not m
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #19034:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19034#discussion_r731414520
##
File path: airflow/models/param.py
##
@@ -38,37 +48,44 @@ class Param:
:type schema: dict
"""
-def __init__(self, default: Any = Non
potiuk merged pull request #19010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19010
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsub
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 8858309 Workaround libstdcpp TLS error (#19010)
88
josh-fell commented on pull request #19052:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19052#issuecomment-946294702
CC @dudutch
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comm
mik-laj closed issue #12508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12508
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr.
mik-laj commented on issue #12508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12508#issuecomment-946298413
Done:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/e25eea052fd54c94b490a377de05c6bae4c24dbb/scripts/docker/install_airflow.sh#L63
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Se
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19052:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19052#issuecomment-946300363
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not m
mik-laj opened a new issue #19059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19059
### Description
According to README.md - "Support for Python and Kubernetes versions":
> We support a new version of Python/Kubernetes in main after they are
officially released, as soon as
uranusjr commented on issue #19059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19059#issuecomment-946304173
The `ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pwd'` error the user gets is
weird though. Airflow should have no problem running on 3.10 (albeit not
officially supported), and the `pw
mik-laj opened a new pull request #19060:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19060
Related: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19059
Some users are unaware of the supported Python versions and then have
trouble using Airflow. It's best to alert them to be aware of potentia
uranusjr opened a new pull request #19061:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19061
AIP-39 changed the canonical name from Execution Date, and this should match
it.
I'm wondering whether we should change the trigger page to have _two_
calendar pickers to represent the data
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19061:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19061#issuecomment-946313479
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not m
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #19060:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19060#discussion_r731444613
##
File path: airflow/__main__.py
##
@@ -19,20 +19,28 @@
# under the License.
"""Main executable module"""
-
+import logging
import os
import a
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
bbovenzi pushed a commit to branch replace-execution-date-with-logical-date
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
commit babe8fde5a3b17b9b50e1ddbfd21a35031b27ada
Author: Brent Bovenzi
AuthorDate: Mon Oct
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
bbovenzi pushed a change to branch replace-execution-date-with-logical-date
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
at babe8fd Rename execution date in forms and tables
This branch includes the fol
josh-fell opened a new pull request #19062:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19062
There is an ongoing effort to enhance example DAGs by setting static values
for `start_date` (already complete for core example DAGs), cleaning up and/or
implementing useful `default_args`, and re
josh-fell commented on a change in pull request #19062:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19062#discussion_r731458987
##
File path:
airflow/providers/microsoft/azure/example_dags/example_azure_blob_to_gcs.py
##
@@ -16,44 +16,33 @@
# specific language governing permi
josh-fell commented on a change in pull request #19062:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19062#discussion_r731459244
##
File path:
airflow/providers/microsoft/azure/example_dags/example_azure_container_instances.py
##
@@ -27,17 +27,10 @@
with DAG(
dag_id='ac
bbovenzi opened a new pull request #19063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19063
Update references of "Execution Date" to "Logical Date" in forms and tables
of the UI.
Examples:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4600967/137837436-d77879cc-fcba-4d46-9024-c1160ef
josh-fell commented on a change in pull request #19062:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19062#discussion_r731459744
##
File path: airflow/providers/microsoft/winrm/example_dags/example_winrm.py
##
@@ -28,23 +28,22 @@
"""
This is an example dag for using the WinRMO
josh-fell commented on a change in pull request #19062:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19062#discussion_r731459874
##
File path:
docs/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/operators/azure_blob_to_gcs.rst
##
@@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ Operator transfers data from Azure
prabhjyotsingh commented on pull request #19025:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19025#issuecomment-946336910
Nothing new looks broken 🤞. "Lint Helm Chart" failure looks unrelated.
![option2-final](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/674497/137839218-3d80d341-7089-4
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19063#issuecomment-946345806
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not m
andrenerd closed issue #19037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19037
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubsc
kd2718 commented on a change in pull request #19036:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19036#discussion_r731487808
##
File path: airflow/kubernetes/pod_generator.py
##
@@ -460,9 +460,9 @@ def make_unique_pod_id(pod_id: str) -> str:
safe_uuid = uuid.uuid4().
ashmeet13 commented on issue #17778:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17778#issuecomment-946369213
Hi @mrbazzan, sorry should have updated here - I am not you can go ahead and
pick this up. My bad.
I did however start on this and you can find a bit of code that I had
wr
uranusjr opened a new pull request #19064:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19064
See #19059.
Version parsing capabilities when building provider packages is now provided
by `packaging.version.Version` instead. Non-Python software version parsing
(sqlite) is re-implemente
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19036:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19036#issuecomment-946378601
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and tak
Bowrna commented on issue #19045:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19045#issuecomment-946382127
thank you @potiuk for your description. I will fix this and raise the PR.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to G
lwyszomi closed pull request #18879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18879
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-uns
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #18924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18924#discussion_r731519692
##
File path: airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/dag_endpoint.py
##
@@ -60,13 +60,16 @@ def get_dag_details(dag_id):
@security.requires_access([(permissi
uranusjr commented on pull request #18934:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18934#issuecomment-946395002
Any thoughts on the general approach taken here? Again, the abstraction
implemented here is not really affected by what OpenAPI implementation we use.
--
This is an automat
uranusjr merged pull request #18790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18790
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-uns
uranusjr closed issue #18789:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18789
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
uranusjr pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 0e95b57 Google provider catch invalid secret nam
Jaxing commented on issue #19040:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19040#issuecomment-946406584
We have never been have never been explicitly on 3.6 that is if the default
changed from 3.6 to 3.8?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
uranusjr commented on issue #19040:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19040#issuecomment-946407561
> that is if the default changed from 3.6 to 3.8?
It did not, but even if it did there shouldn't be a problem. What seems to
have happened is the other way around: The _2.1_
brain-buster opened a new pull request #19065:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19065
related: #19006
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubsc
mrbazzan commented on issue #17778:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17778#issuecomment-946420073
@ashmeet13 Oh... Thanks, that'll help.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
101 - 150 of 150 matches
Mail list logo