eskarimov opened a new pull request #20062:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20062
The PR intends to close the issue #19382, using task's original `start_date`
when it continues after deferral.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
uranusjr commented on pull request #20011:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20011#issuecomment-986552930
Wow autoapi 1.0 is so fucking ancient even my workaround does not work.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
malthe commented on issue #9298:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9298#issuecomment-986562766
And perhaps add optional operator option `email_on_hold` to be able to send
an e-mail when a task is put on-hold.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To res
Bowrna commented on issue #19967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19967#issuecomment-986567570
@potiuk I am planning to start this with one actual command and adding
autocomplete for that one command and create help docs with that. Am i going in
right direction?
--
This is
eladkal commented on issue #9298:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9298#issuecomment-986569295
To my understanding a possible solution is to change the `On`/`Off` from DAG
level to Task level.
So a DAG would be considered ON if at least one of it’s task is ON. Even
assuming
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #20063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20063#issuecomment-986570583
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
davidavdav opened a new issue #20063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20063
### Apache Airflow version
2.1.4
### Operating System
linux
### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
apache-airflow-providers-amazon==2.2.0
apache-airflow-providers
malthe commented on issue #9298:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9298#issuecomment-986574890
I think that's probably the best you can do yes. After each DAG run, use the
`on_failure_callback` and `on_success_callback` methods to disable the DAG
model (i.e., put it into "off"
malthe edited a comment on issue #9298:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9298#issuecomment-986574890
I think that's probably the best you can do yes. After each DAG run, use the
`on_failure_callback` and `on_success_callback` methods to disable the DAG
model (i.e., put it into
malthe edited a comment on issue #9298:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9298#issuecomment-986574890
I think that's probably the best you can do yes. After each DAG run, use the
`on_failure_callback` and `on_success_callback` methods to disable the DAG
model (i.e., put it into
Aakcht opened a new pull request #20064:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20064
A minor inconsistency I noticed in #19054 - all the filenames in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/chart/templates/secrets end with
`-secrets` except for the keytab secret I added #19054 .
stablum commented on issue #19957:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19957#issuecomment-986608097
Hmm, it's difficult to retrieve this bit of information. I don't think there
were multiple instances of the scheduler running, but I will keep in mind this
eventuality, so thank yo
stablum edited a comment on issue #19957:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19957#issuecomment-986608097
Hmm, it's difficult to retrieve this bit of information. I don't think there
were multiple instances of the scheduler running, but I will keep in mind this
eventuality, so t
casra-developers commented on pull request #16110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16110#issuecomment-986620429
@uranusjr sorry for the late reply. I was away for three weeks and had no
access to my business mail. I will pull the latest changes from the main branch
and try to
kazanzhy commented on pull request #20044:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20044#issuecomment-986629622
Yep, I've already read all that conversation.
I want to say that this PR adds a lot of flexibility and that's cool.
I just wonder how confusing might be to see in UI runn
kazanzhy edited a comment on pull request #20044:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20044#issuecomment-986629622
Yep, I've already read all that conversation.
I want to say that this PR adds a lot of flexibility and that's cool.
I just wonder how confusing might be to see in
uranusjr commented on pull request #20011:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20011#issuecomment-986653528
I added a hack to allow manually telling AutoAPI to ignore any code
construct if the docstring contains `:sphinx-autoapi-skip:`. This is probably
the best thing we can do, sh
Bowrna opened a new pull request #20066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20066
closes: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19967#issuecomment-986567570
Breeze rewrite in Python - Sample autocomplete option for breeze commands
---
**^ Add meaningful descripti
ephraimbuddy opened a new pull request #20069:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20069
The `airflow db check-migrations` command is missing a migration wait timeout
value in the helm chart resulting in unexpected failures at times.
This PR adds a default timeout to the co
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #20069:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20069#discussion_r762930605
##
File path: chart/tests/conftest.py
##
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
from filelock import FileLock
-@pytest.fixture(autouse=True, scope="session")
+@pyt
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #20069:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20069#discussion_r762930605
##
File path: chart/tests/conftest.py
##
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
from filelock import FileLock
-@pytest.fixture(autouse=True, scope="session")
+@pyt
potiuk commented on pull request #19992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19992#issuecomment-986698026
> Did you move Breeze2.exe to another place to run it?
@edithturn - yep. I moved it to main folder of Airflow. This is where it
shoudl be eventually if someone wants to
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #20062:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20062#discussion_r762953978
##
File path: airflow/models/taskinstance.py
##
@@ -1200,7 +1200,8 @@ def check_and_change_state_before_execution(
# Attempt 0 for the fir
kazanzhy commented on a change in pull request #20044:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20044#discussion_r762954844
##
File path: tests/operators/test_python.py
##
@@ -580,128 +582,164 @@ def test_raise_exception_on_invalid_task_id(self):
class TestShortCircuitOpera
eladkal commented on issue #18918:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18918#issuecomment-986724879
Your code indeed not working but this code do work:
```
with DAG(
dag_id='future_dag2',
start_date=datetime(2021, 1, 1),
schedule_interval=timedelta(we
eladkal closed issue #18918:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18918
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr.
kazanzhy commented on pull request #20058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20058#issuecomment-986725374
Just fixed some issues with doc build.
Now local doc building works well
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please lo
eladkal edited a comment on issue #18918:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18918#issuecomment-986724879
Your code indeed doesn't start the task but following code will work:
```
with DAG(
dag_id='future_dag2',
start_date=datetime(2021, 1, 1),
sched
uranusjr commented on issue #20063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20063#issuecomment-986728173
Hmm, this is tricky. We can’t just allow slash in `dag_run_id` either
because there are endpoints like
`/dags/{dag_id}/dagRuns/{dag_run_id}/taskInstances` that would cause ambigui
kaxil commented on issue #20055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20055#issuecomment-986731911
Airflow has a utility for it that you can use to make sure you don't need to
use anything else.
```python
from airflow.utils import timezone
now = timezone.utcnow()
uranusjr commented on pull request #19953:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19953#issuecomment-986733565
Weird, I just checked out this locally and can’t reproduce. Let me merge
main and see if it’s just something wrong in the CI workers.
--
This is an automated message from t
kaxil commented on issue #20016:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20016#issuecomment-986736514
### How to downgrade?
Apply this diff and then run `alembic downgrade ccde3e26fe78` from airflow
migrations directory:
```
cd $(python -c "import airflow; import os;
potiuk commented on issue #20055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20055#issuecomment-986736774
Yeah. Concur with @kaxil - maybe there are some ways we can make it
clearer. I will convert this into discussion now - but maybe we can contine
discussing what can be done to impr
potiuk commented on issue #20063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20063#issuecomment-986738954
Agreee. The %2F is the only "good" way to go. And if it does not work - I
think we should probably fix it. This might become handdy when we add
multi-tenancy. "/" seems to be for ex
potiuk edited a comment on issue #20063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20063#issuecomment-986738954
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsub
kazanzhy opened a new pull request #20071:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20071
closes: #19922
related: #20044
Add return condition for `ShortCircuinOperator`.
If `python_callable` returns the object that casts as `True` then that
object will be available as XCom w
potiuk commented on pull request #20058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20058#issuecomment-986741155
some provider.yaml inconsistency :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to g
potiuk commented on pull request #20069:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20069#issuecomment-986744395
Question - what woudl be the cases where timing out on migration is "wrong"
? Woudl not that leave the DB in a state that is not expected ? However I
think that one is fine to
potiuk commented on pull request #18439:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18439#issuecomment-986744856
Hey @kaxil - have your worries been addressed?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #20069:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20069#issuecomment-986744395
Question - what woudl be the cases where timing out on migration is "wrong"
? Wouls not that leave the DB in a state that is not expected ? However I
think that one is
potiuk commented on pull request #20058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20058#issuecomment-986753099
BTW @kazanzhy. I STRONGLY recommend `pip install pre-commit`. It saves a TON
of time on iterations like that :).
See https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/STATIC_CODE_C
ephraimbuddy commented on pull request #20069:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20069#issuecomment-986752938
> Question - what woudl be the cases where timing out on migration is
"wrong" ? Wouls not that leave the DB in a state that is not expected ? However
I think that one is
ephraimbuddy edited a comment on pull request #20069:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20069#issuecomment-986752938
> Question - what woudl be the cases where timing out on migration is
"wrong" ? Wouls not that leave the DB in a state that is not expected ? However
I think that
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #20058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20058#issuecomment-986753099
BTW @kazanzhy. I STRONGLY recommend `pip install pre-commit` followed by
'pre-commit install'. It saves a TON of time on iterations like that :).
See https://github.co
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #20058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20058#issuecomment-986753099
BTW @kazanzhy. I STRONGLY recommend `pip install pre-commit` followed by
`pre-commit install`. It saves a TON of time on iterations like that :).
See https://github.co
edithturn commented on pull request #19992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19992#issuecomment-986755223
`@edithturn - yep. I moved it to main folder of Airflow. This is where it
shoudl be eventually if someone wants to run it - because "dist" is a temporary
folder that gets ov
potiuk commented on pull request #20069:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20069#issuecomment-986756000
Ah I see. But I hopw #18439 could be also merged, that would help A LOT in a
meaningful message to the user if the timeout actually happens. Or is timeout
equivalent with "erro
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #20069:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20069#issuecomment-986756000
Ah I see. But I hope #18439 could be also merged, that would help A LOT in a
meaningful message to the user if the timeout actually happens. Or is timeout
equivalent wit
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #19993:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19993#discussion_r762991737
##
File path: docs/apache-airflow/installation/upgrading.rst
##
@@ -79,6 +79,20 @@ table or rename it or move it to another database using
those tools.
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #19993:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19993#discussion_r762991737
##
File path: docs/apache-airflow/installation/upgrading.rst
##
@@ -79,6 +79,20 @@ table or rename it or move it to another database using
those tools.
eladkal commented on a change in pull request #19993:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19993#discussion_r762992430
##
File path: docs/apache-airflow/installation/upgrading.rst
##
@@ -79,6 +79,20 @@ table or rename it or move it to another database using
those tools.
Aakcht commented on pull request #20064:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20064#issuecomment-986761790
Looks like the not successful check is not related to this PR, I can
retrigger it if needed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the me
Melodie97 commented on issue #19972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19972#issuecomment-986763145
Currently looking at how to go about this, will keep everyone updated
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Gi
uranusjr commented on pull request #19953:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19953#issuecomment-986764654
Oh never mind I got it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the sp
ephraimbuddy commented on pull request #20069:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20069#issuecomment-986767778
> Ah I see. But I hope #18439 could be also merged, that would help A LOT in
a meaningful message to the user if the timeout actually happens. Or is timeout
equivalent wi
ashb commented on a change in pull request #20011:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20011#discussion_r763000313
##
File path: airflow/models/skipmixin.py
##
@@ -66,9 +67,10 @@ def _set_state_to_skipped(self, dag_run: "DagRun", tasks:
"Iterable[BaseOperator
def
ashb commented on a change in pull request #20011:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20011#discussion_r763000669
##
File path: airflow/models/xcom.py
##
@@ -79,144 +80,247 @@ def init_on_load(self):
def __repr__(self):
return f''
+@overload
@c
BasPH commented on pull request #19990:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19990#issuecomment-986789436
Moved the version dropdown to the top:
--
This is an auto
uranusjr commented on pull request #19953:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19953#issuecomment-986790016
I pushed a change to fix that test failure.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL a
ashb commented on issue #20016:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20016#issuecomment-986793360
Could it be cos of Airflow still running while trying to upgrade?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #19953:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19953#discussion_r763037847
##
File path: tests/www/views/test_views_rendered.py
##
@@ -154,13 +154,17 @@ def
test_user_defined_filter_and_macros_raise_error(admin_client, create_d
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19953:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19953#issuecomment-986809689
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and tak
casra-developers commented on pull request #16110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16110#issuecomment-986812778
@uranusjr I have completed the manual merge of the main branch. Everything
seems to work in the test environment, the only thing I have noticed that there
seems to be
potiuk commented on pull request #16110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16110#issuecomment-986815237
Ah. Cool we are also working on Breeze rewrite in Python, that would make it
more "open" to Windows (no WSL2) users.
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19992 so this is ha
potiuk commented on pull request #19990:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19990#issuecomment-986816738
Looks Great to me :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specif
potiuk commented on pull request #19990:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19990#issuecomment-986817536
@jedcunningham and others - any comments :), or shall we merge it?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Git
jens-scheffler-bosch commented on issue #19848:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19848#issuecomment-986822792
Thanks for the feedback, the intent was not to run into legal constraints
nor to get into any conflict with trademarks - of course the Apache rules like
"powered by" w
jens-scheffler-bosch closed issue #19848:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19848
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: comm
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/2#discussion_r763049790
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1325,7 +1335,7 @@ def run(
execution_date=info.logical_date,
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20069:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20069#issuecomment-986825665
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not m
uranusjr closed issue #19761:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19761
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #19953:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19953#issuecomment-986827547
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
uranusjr merged pull request #19953:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19953
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-uns
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
uranusjr pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 6e15e3a Bug fix in AWS glue operator when specifying the WorkerType &
NumberOfWorkers (#19787)
add ba6b7c7 u
neptune19821220 commented on issue #20016:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20016#issuecomment-986828774
Hi All,
For further test, I use mysqldump to dump the airflow database from staging
Aurora serverless.
1. I restore the data to a new AWS RDS mysql 5.7 instance w
potiuk edited a comment on issue #19972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19972#issuecomment-986830720
Also @Melodie97 - see thee #20053 - it turned out that the idea of
@subkanthi was about adding a provider to expose PushGateway API via provider,
so it is indeed different fr
potiuk commented on issue #19972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19972#issuecomment-986830720
Also @Melodie97 - see thee #20053 - it turned out that the idea of
@subkanthi was about adding a provider to expose PushGateway API via provider,
so it is indeed different from our
thomashutcheson-msm commented on issue #12061:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12061#issuecomment-986836974
Did the example dag get created, I would find this really useful right now ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pl
ashb commented on a change in pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/2#discussion_r763067505
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1301,8 +1305,13 @@ def run(
from airflow.models import DagRun
from airflow.utils.type
potiuk edited a comment on issue #20016:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20016#issuecomment-986838313
Is this possible that you send more logs of what happens including possibly
server side logs from around the upgrade?
I have a feeling that this might be similar class
potiuk commented on issue #20016:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20016#issuecomment-986838313
Is this possible that you send more logs of what happens including possibly
server side logs from around the upgrade. I have a feeling that this might be
similar class of error like
malthe opened a new pull request #20072:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20072
This adds a new method:
```python
OracleHook.callproc(identifier: str, parameters: Optional[Union[Dict, List]]
= None)
```
(In the actual code, the `parameters` argument ar
ashb commented on a change in pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/2#discussion_r763068672
##
File path: airflow/models/dag.py
##
@@ -403,11 +403,12 @@ def __init__(
# set timezone from start_date
tz = None
if start_dat
ashb commented on a change in pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/2#discussion_r763070493
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1325,7 +1335,7 @@ def run(
execution_date=info.logical_date,
neptune19821220 edited a comment on issue #20016:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20016#issuecomment-986828774
Hi All,
For further test, I use mysqldump to dump the airflow database from staging
Aurora serverless.
1. I restore the data to a new AWS RDS mysql 5.7 ins
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/2#discussion_r763071994
##
File path: airflow/models/dag.py
##
@@ -403,11 +403,12 @@ def __init__(
# set timezone from start_date
tz = None
if start_d
neptune19821220 commented on issue #20016:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20016#issuecomment-986844030
@potiuk @ashb
Thank you for your reply.
Though I didn't stop airflow service during the upgrade, there is no any
running task during the upgrade.
I choose a fr
subkanthi commented on issue #19972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19972#issuecomment-986844568
> Also @Melodie97 - see thee #20053 - it turned out that the idea of
@subkanthi was about adding a provider to expose PushGateway API via provider,
so it is indeed different from
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20064:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20064#issuecomment-986845998
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not m
potiuk commented on pull request #20064:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20064#issuecomment-986846054
I think even if it "was" released, we could change it still. That's the
beauty of helm chart that it packages things nicely and thins like file names
are really implementation
potiuk merged pull request #20064:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20064
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsub
ashb commented on a change in pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/2#discussion_r763076763
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1301,8 +1305,13 @@ def run(
from airflow.models import DagRun
from airflow.utils.type
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from ba6b7c7 update upper bound for MarkupSafe (#19953)
add cc3f038 Chart: Rename kerberos-keytab secret file (#2006
casra-developers commented on pull request #16110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16110#issuecomment-986846900
Agreed. Especially for weird setups like ours where Linux and Windows
systems have to work together, this can potentially be very useful.
I have noticed that there
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #19993:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19993#discussion_r763077077
##
File path: docs/apache-airflow/installation/upgrading.rst
##
@@ -79,6 +79,20 @@ table or rename it or move it to another database using
those tools.
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/2#discussion_r763083688
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1301,8 +1305,13 @@ def run(
from airflow.models import DagRun
from airflow.utils.ty
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/2#discussion_r763083954
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1301,8 +1305,13 @@ def run(
from airflow.models import DagRun
from airflow.utils.ty
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/2#discussion_r763084583
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1301,8 +1305,13 @@ def run(
from airflow.models import DagRun
from airflow.utils.ty
potiuk commented on pull request #16110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16110#issuecomment-986859488
> I have noticed that there are four tests of type www which are failing.
I'm assuming that this is something that has nothing todo with our changes,
right?
I also see i
potiuk commented on pull request #16110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16110#issuecomment-986859848
https://github.com/apache/airflow/runs/4430426331
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
U
1 - 100 of 358 matches
Mail list logo
