github-actions[bot] commented on PR #22848:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22848#issuecomment-1092482704
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and take the risk
appassionate commented on issue #21867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21867#issuecomment-1092473308
Hi, I believe Taskgroup is supposed to have the same "retry” feature that
subdagopt had. In other words, TaskGroup (in my opinion) might will be like a
"sub-pipeline" that ca
jedcunningham opened a new pull request, #22851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22851
This reverts commit 78586b45a0f6007ab6b94c35b33790a944856e5e from #22588.
I played with incorporating these concepts into `airflow config list` behind
flags tonight, but had trouble main
dstandish commented on code in PR #22848:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22848#discussion_r845742545
##
airflow/migrations/utils.py:
##
@@ -41,3 +41,16 @@ def get_mssql_table_constraints(conn, table_name):
for constraint, constraint_type, col_name in result:
dstandish opened a new pull request, #22850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22850
WIP
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
houqp pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 913eaa0e95 Support conf param override for backfill
houqp merged PR #22837:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22837
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.ap
uranusjr commented on code in PR #22699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22699#discussion_r845733347
##
airflow/models/dag.py:
##
@@ -2280,6 +2284,12 @@ def create_dagrun(
"Creating DagRun needs either `run_id` or both `run_type` and
`execution_date
jedcunningham commented on code in PR #22848:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22848#discussion_r845732615
##
airflow/migrations/utils.py:
##
@@ -41,3 +41,16 @@ def get_mssql_table_constraints(conn, table_name):
for constraint, constraint_type, col_name in result
jedcunningham commented on code in PR #22848:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22848#discussion_r845732463
##
airflow/migrations/utils.py:
##
@@ -41,3 +41,16 @@ def get_mssql_table_constraints(conn, table_name):
for constraint, constraint_type, col_name in result
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #22804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22804#issuecomment-1092435684
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not modify the
uranusjr opened a new pull request, #22849:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22849
Fix #22833.
This needs two changes. First, when the upstream pushes the return value to
XCom, we need to identify that the pushed value is not used on its own, but
only aggregated with other
dstandish opened a new pull request, #22848:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22848
If we do not disable FKs then it has the side effect of deleting all task
instances.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
houqp closed pull request #22698: support dag serialization with custom ti_deps
rules
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22698
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific c
houqp commented on PR #22699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22699#issuecomment-1092411914
updated code to disable button in the UI
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
hankehly commented on code in PR #22804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22804#discussion_r845710406
##
airflow/www/static/js/ti_log.js:
##
@@ -153,4 +171,10 @@ $(document).ready(() => {
const autoTailing = i === TOTAL_ATTEMPTS;
autoTailingLog(i, null, auto
uranusjr commented on code in PR #22804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22804#discussion_r845710038
##
airflow/www/static/js/ti_log.js:
##
@@ -153,4 +171,10 @@ $(document).ready(() => {
const autoTailing = i === TOTAL_ATTEMPTS;
autoTailingLog(i, null, auto
houqp commented on PR #22699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22699#issuecomment-1092401944
@ashb @uranusjr if we pass the responsibility to
`Timetable.infer_manual_data_interval`, how do we enforce this given users can
override `infer_manual_data_interval`'s behavior with subcl
evanrosebrook commented on PR #22676:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22676#issuecomment-1092397752
Seems like a `lookup` based solution is the only viable option. I understand
that it won't work for `dry-run`s etc, but I haven't been able to think of
anything else. Any other id
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
dstandish pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 57884f93dd Temporarily disable task_fail pre-upg
dstandish merged PR #22839:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22839
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflo
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
dstandish pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from 1f29d84441 Bump prismjs from 1.26.0 to 1.27.0 in /airflow/www (#22823)
add 4993c7c941 Add 2.2.5 to revision hea
dstandish merged PR #22841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22841
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflo
SasanAhmadi commented on issue #22836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22836#issuecomment-1092319349
from my side:
- testing for jenkins sensor was done:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22421
- testing for jenkins job trigger operator was done:
https://github.com/
hankehly commented on PR #22804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22804#issuecomment-1092318616
@uranusjr @bbovenzi Please check again at your earliest convenience
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #21281:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/21281#issuecomment-1092317901
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for you
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #21431:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/21431#issuecomment-1092317888
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for you
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #22847:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22847#issuecomment-1092306095
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
l0n3r4n83r opened a new issue, #22847:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22847
### Apache Airflow version
2.2.4
### What happened
Click Admin -> List Users -> Click on Show Record (Magnifying Glass icon)
gives the following error
```
Python version:
MatrixManAtYrService commented on issue #22843:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22843#issuecomment-1092301293
This appears to be the case for any falsey value. Consider this dag:
```python3
@dag
def paramstuff(x, a=Param(2, minimum=0)):
@task
def add(
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #22846:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22846#issuecomment-1092300050
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
fuxiao224 opened a new issue, #22846:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22846
### Apache Airflow version
2.2.5 (latest released)
### What happened
I noticed that UUID is encoded in CassandraToGCSOperator by:
`elif isinstance(value, UUID):
MatrixManAtYrService commented on issue #22843:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22843#issuecomment-1092280928
My initial feeling is that positional args on dag decorated functions should
not be interpreted as dag params, so you could do things like this:
```python3
@t
jedcunningham opened a new pull request, #22845:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22845
The kubernetes provider now requires core 2.3.0+, so we can safely dedup
this code 🎉
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
jedcunningham opened a new pull request, #22844:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22844
Soften the language for `remote_log_conn_id` because some remote services do
use it to write (s3).
Related: #20499
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To resp
eladkal commented on PR #22841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22841#issuecomment-1092245810
Should we mention it as a step in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_AIRFLOW.md
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
pateash commented on issue #22816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22816#issuecomment-1092224154
@potiuk,
I didn't mean to be rhetorical or disrespectful.
I just wanted to have some discussion around this.
As I have faced this scenario before as well in our usecases
eladkal commented on issue #15994:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15994#issuecomment-1092210860
PR for renaming `DummyOperator`: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22832
The only task left on this issue is the task that this issue was created for
:)
We need a pr
potiuk commented on issue #22816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22816#issuecomment-1092202617
> Why not?
No. I specifically ask Why? - because when you want to add something you
have to justify it rather than someone should justify why you should not do it.
That's ver
bbovenzi commented on issue #22762:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22762#issuecomment-1092184960
Just heads up, this isn't just the API endpoint used by Grid view. Here is
the same issue in Graph view:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4600967/162295951-488b3984
eladkal commented on issue #22816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22816#issuecomment-1092180331
>and as @eladkal pointed out the following workaround has the issue that, it
doesn't stop/skip the sensor which has not ran successfully yet.
Yes but this is is not limited t
eladkal commented on code in PR #22758:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22758#discussion_r845540146
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/operators/s3.py:
##
@@ -318,6 +318,94 @@ def execute(self, context: 'Context'):
)
+class S3CreateObjectOperator(BaseOperat
eladkal commented on code in PR #22758:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22758#discussion_r845540146
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/operators/s3.py:
##
@@ -318,6 +318,94 @@ def execute(self, context: 'Context'):
)
+class S3CreateObjectOperator(BaseOperat
vincbeck commented on issue #22836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22836#issuecomment-1092172728
All mine are doc and sample dag related so it's all good
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t
vincbeck commented on code in PR #22758:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22758#discussion_r84553
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/operators/s3.py:
##
@@ -318,6 +318,94 @@ def execute(self, context: 'Context'):
)
+class S3CreateObjectOperator(BaseOpera
mnojek commented on issue #22836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22836#issuecomment-1092170175
From my side the testing for Google was done :) #22311
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
houqp commented on code in PR #22793:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22793#discussion_r845532972
##
airflow/models/dagrun.py:
##
@@ -217,6 +217,12 @@ def set_state(self, state: DagRunState):
if state == State.QUEUED:
self.queued_at = ti
houqp commented on code in PR #22793:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22793#discussion_r845532544
##
airflow/models/dagrun.py:
##
@@ -217,6 +217,12 @@ def set_state(self, state: DagRunState):
if state == State.QUEUED:
self.queued_at = ti
pateash commented on issue #22816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22816#issuecomment-1092166923
> > Ideally, We should have a sensor, which allows this
>
> Why?
Why not?
this is a really common scenario.
and as @eladkal pointed out the following workaround
eladkal commented on code in PR #22758:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22758#discussion_r845531831
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/operators/s3.py:
##
@@ -318,6 +318,94 @@ def execute(self, context: 'Context'):
)
+class S3CreateObjectOperator(BaseOperat
potiuk commented on issue #22816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22816#issuecomment-1092161450
> Ideally, We should have a sensor, which allows this
Why?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub an
pateash commented on issue #22816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22816#issuecomment-1092160395
> Isn't that just?
> ```
> s1 = Sensor()
> s2 = Sensor()
> op = Operator(trigger_rule='one_success')
> [s1, s2] >> op
> ```
>
> I guess what missing to make
tronlightracer opened a new issue, #22843:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22843
### Apache Airflow version
2.2.3
### What happened
When passing the `False` value to a decorated dag function I get this
traceback below. Also the default value is not shown wh
vincbeck commented on code in PR #22758:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22758#discussion_r845521556
##
airflow/providers/amazon/aws/operators/s3.py:
##
@@ -318,6 +318,94 @@ def execute(self, context: 'Context'):
)
+class S3CreateObjectOperator(BaseOpera
potiuk commented on issue #22842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22842#issuecomment-1092146627
This is complete misunderstanding of elasticsearch configuration
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch/stable/logging/index.html
You won't get
potiuk closed issue #22842: Environment variables for elastic search logging
have no effect
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22842
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the sp
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #22842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22842#issuecomment-1092129741
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
pastushenkoy opened a new issue, #22842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22842
### Apache Airflow version
2.2.5 (latest released)
### What happened
When I start airflow in official docker container with command:
```
docker run \
-e AIRFLOW__E
eladkal commented on issue #22816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22816#issuecomment-1092123370
Isn't that just?
```
s1 = Sensor()
s2 = Sensor()
op = Operator(trigger_rule='one_success')
[s1, s2] >> op
```
I guess what missing to make it complete is whe
collinmcnulty commented on PR #22332:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22332#issuecomment-1092119473
I recreated the failing test locally with
```
./breeze --github-image-id latest --backend sqlite --python 3.10 --db-reset
--skip-mounting-local-sources --test-type Core she
eladkal commented on code in PR #22832:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22832#discussion_r845490726
##
airflow/serialization/serialized_objects.py:
##
@@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ def _serialize_node(cls, op: Union[BaseOperator,
MappedOperator], include_deps:
serial
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #22841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22841#issuecomment-1092114435
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and take the risk
dstandish opened a new pull request, #22841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22841
This is necessary to allow for downgrade to 2.2.5
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
tanelk commented on issue #20982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20982#issuecomment-1092089810
I have never worked with kubernetes, but based on the triggering code:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/1f29d844411522e9a2cd4a14c3573e903b4e5074/airflow/www/views.py#L1786-L
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #22840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22840#issuecomment-1092087079
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not modify the
potiuk commented on issue #22448:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22448#issuecomment-1092086813
Feel free.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
bbovenzi pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from 56ab82ed7a Prepare mid-April provider documentation. (#22819)
add 1f29d84441 Bump prismjs from 1.26.0 to 1.27.0
bbovenzi merged PR #22823:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22823
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow
bbovenzi opened a new pull request, #22840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22840
If there was an error during autorefresh in Grid view. The page would crash
because we weren't handling the error well. `axios` handles errors better than
fetch so I swapped that in and added a toa
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
bbovenzi pushed a commit to branch handle-grid-autorefresh-errors
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
commit 9c8f84b794673f06b808f8c35be652d416671e97
Author: Brent Bovenzi
AuthorDate: Thu Apr 7 14:29:16
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
bbovenzi pushed a change to branch handle-grid-autorefresh-errors
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
at 9c8f84b794 Better handle auto-refresh errors
This branch includes the following new commit
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #22839:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22839#issuecomment-1092048404
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and take the risk
dstandish opened a new pull request, #22839:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22839
I am reworking it to actually move the rows but for now we can disable it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
potiuk commented on issue #21104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21104#issuecomment-1092029499
Please :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To u
Siraj-Qazi commented on PR #21053:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/21053#issuecomment-1092019535
@microhuang where you @?
> @microhuang do you wish to finish the work on this PR?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messa
houqp commented on PR #22698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22698#issuecomment-1092010940
@ashb pushed a new version to raise serialization error exception in both
serialization and deserialization code paths so user will be always aware of
the problem.
--
This is an automa
Bowrna commented on PR #22811:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22811#issuecomment-1092007009
I get the following error when I run the test using pytest in breeze
environment for Elasticsearch. Could you share your insights on where I am
going wrong? I have configured to run the
Bowrna commented on issue #21104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21104#issuecomment-1092004045
@potiuk Shall I pick up this task? :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #22837:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22837#issuecomment-1091979189
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and take the risk
eugene-nikolaev commented on issue #16163:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16163#issuecomment-1091972835
Hi!
Just ran into the issue, having an "amqp://" starting broker url.
Will it be fixed in 2.3.0?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To resp
PronetAI opened a new pull request, #22838:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22838
Lets us put all of the import modules into one file for file reduction, also
one quick questions, why are we importing
from airflow.hooks.base import BaseHook
from airflow.models.baseoperator
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on PR #22838:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22838#issuecomment-1091972008
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our Contribution
uranusjr commented on PR #22699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22699#issuecomment-1091970513
That’d work. Another solution I can think of is to introduce a helper class:
```python
from airflow.timetables import ScheduleInterval
DAG(timetable=ScheduleInterval(wha
uranusjr commented on code in PR #22787:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22787#discussion_r845357929
##
airflow/www/utils.py:
##
@@ -113,6 +113,17 @@ def get_mapped_summary(parent_instance, task_instances):
if parent_instance.prev_attempted_tries != 0
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
dstandish pushed a change to branch providers-amazon
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
at f77417eb0d Fix K8S changelog to be PyPI-compatible (#20614)
No new revisions were added by this update.
dan-vaughan commented on PR #22182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22182#issuecomment-1091966854
@jedcunningham I fixed a test error & have tested locally, I think I need
you to trigger the full set of unit-tests before we merge this in?
--
This is an automated message from t
ashb commented on code in PR #22787:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22787#discussion_r845353739
##
airflow/www/static/js/tree/treeDataUtils.js:
##
@@ -17,5 +17,13 @@
* under the License.
*/
-// eslint-disable-next-line import/prefer-default-export
export cons
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
bbovenzi pushed a change to branch camelCase-tree-data
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from bf5119c985 Use JSON.parse() for treeData
add 127fc674ec Fix test, swap formatData to a parseJson
houqp opened a new pull request, #22837:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22837
It was not possible to trigger a backfill run with a different dag run conf
prior to this rix.
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guid
ashb commented on PR #22699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22699#issuecomment-1091920130
Oh yeah -- maybe we move the handling of the param to Timetable classes, but
accept the parameter on the DAG constructor?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
uranusjr commented on PR #22699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22699#issuecomment-1091911716
Adding it to the timetable sounds like the right thing, but has the obvious
downside of making easy cases currently using `schedule_interval` much more
verbose.
--
This is an automa
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
bbovenzi pushed a change to branch camelCase-tree-data
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from 0552abc465 Fix react tests
add bf5119c985 Use JSON.parse() for treeData
No new revisions were ad
bbovenzi commented on issue #22774:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22774#issuecomment-1091910385
@parisni Could you add a screenshot of the filter you are trying to apply?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on t
uranusjr commented on code in PR #22671:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22671#discussion_r845302277
##
airflow/www/views.py:
##
@@ -756,13 +758,13 @@ def index(self):
current_dags = all_dags
num_of_all_dags = all_dags_count
-
potiuk opened a new issue, #22836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22836
### Body
I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider
packages release.
Could you please help us to test the RC versions of the providers?
Let us know in the comme
bbovenzi commented on code in PR #22835:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22835#discussion_r845297135
##
airflow/www/static/js/calendar.js:
##
@@ -63,9 +63,6 @@ const dateFormat = '-MM-DD';
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', () => {
$('span.status_s
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch add-documentation-2022-04-07
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow-site.git
at d14ab02dd Add documentation for packages - 2022-04-07
This branch includes the following
ashb commented on code in PR #22835:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22835#discussion_r845294811
##
airflow/www/static/js/calendar.js:
##
@@ -63,9 +63,6 @@ const dateFormat = '-MM-DD';
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', () => {
$('span.status_squar
bbovenzi closed pull request #22835: Remove extraneous json parsing in Calendar
and Grid
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22835
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specifi
ashb commented on code in PR #22835:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22835#discussion_r845293558
##
airflow/www/static/js/calendar.js:
##
@@ -63,9 +63,6 @@ const dateFormat = '-MM-DD';
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', () => {
$('span.status_squar
1 - 100 of 283 matches
Mail list logo
