eladkal commented on code in PR #23861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23861#discussion_r879085897
##
airflow/config_templates/config.yml:
##
@@ -249,6 +249,14 @@
type: string
example: ~
default: "0"
+- name: default_task_retry_delay
+
eskarimov commented on PR #19736:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19736#issuecomment-1134269034
Thank you everyone for your reviews, ideas and activity! :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t
tirkarthi commented on issue #23727:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23727#issuecomment-1134295021
A related Stackoverflow question :
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67929230/airflow-2-0-1-pod-template-override-not-working-as-expected-for-kubernetesexecu
--
This is an au
bbovenzi merged PR #23678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23678
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
bbovenzi pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 637a8b8af1 Highlight task states by hovering on l
potiuk commented on issue #23727:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23727#issuecomment-1134315657
Yeah - it does look as the deserialisation issue as I suspected. Just a
thought - we do have the new
`airflow dags reserialize` command in Airflow.
I wonder @patryk126p
potiuk commented on issue #23727:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23727#issuecomment-1134318907
This command is exactly foreseen for this kind of cases where the dags were
serialized using older airflow versions.
I suspect what could have happened is that the old dags we
potiuk commented on issue #23803:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23803#issuecomment-1134330504
Also - another thing I usually recommend in this case - maybe this is not
really a big problem that you cannot use it in classsic Airflow Operators. I
think - personally - we should
kouk commented on issue #16828:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16828#issuecomment-113435
I have started working on this here:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/compare/main...kouk:support-es-index-patterns?expand=1
it's still a WIP but any feedback would be helpful.
-
zqd759592942 opened a new issue, #23863:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23863
### What do you see as an issue?
Does airflow have task configuration based on worker machine cpu or memory
load balancing
### Solving the problem
_No response_
### Anythi
ashb commented on issue #23803:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23803#issuecomment-1134392649
One downside to not using (classic) operators but just using PythonOperator
(decoratored or not) i sht we loose much of the ability to see what the task is
doing from a lineage PoV. (
msumit commented on code in PR #23861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23861#discussion_r879209598
##
airflow/config_templates/config.yml:
##
@@ -249,6 +249,14 @@
type: string
example: ~
default: "0"
+- name: default_task_retry_delay
+ d
mhenc opened a new pull request, #23864:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23864
The value defaults to `settings.DAGS_FOLDER` if not set:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/637a8b8af132e6231756160a3f6ce7ed789abaf6/airflow/cli/cli_parser.py#L193
--
This is an automated me
mhenc commented on PR #23864:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23864#issuecomment-1134408095
cc: @potiuk
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsu
eladkal commented on code in PR #23861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23861#discussion_r879213035
##
airflow/config_templates/config.yml:
##
@@ -249,6 +249,14 @@
type: string
example: ~
default: "0"
+- name: default_task_retry_delay
+
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #23861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23861#issuecomment-1134414084
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and take the risk
wojsamjan opened a new pull request, #23865:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23865
Add links to assets for Cloud Storage
Co-authored-by: Wojciech Januszek
[janus...@google.com](mailto:janus...@google.com)
Co-authored-by: Lukasz Wyszomirski
[wyszomir...@google.c
cansjt commented on issue #23852:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23852#issuecomment-1134472514
I am sorry, but I am alone this week (my colleagues are off), so it's
doubtful I will find the time to check.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respo
gmsantos commented on issue #23852:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23852#issuecomment-1134485019
For #23590 (related to https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/23489
and #23580), tasks with `.` are shown again in grid view.
I checked that #23521 also fixes the sch
parthpalkhiwala-vonage commented on issue #20875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20875#issuecomment-1134486949
Hello All,
We are still facing a similar issuing while upgrading our airflow version
from 2.1.3 to 2.2.5
Below is the error we are getting - this usually occurs
gmsantos commented on issue #23852:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23852#issuecomment-1134511408
#23625: working fine as well
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the sp
uranusjr commented on code in PR #23861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23861#discussion_r879348378
##
airflow/config_templates/config.yml:
##
@@ -249,6 +249,14 @@
type: string
example: ~
default: "0"
+- name: default_task_retry_delay
+
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #23864:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23864#issuecomment-1134559304
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not modify the
potiuk commented on issue #23863:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23863#issuecomment-1134561823
No. And please next time follow what you are edlladvised to when you open an
issue. You should open Discussion when you have question. NOT issue
--
This is an automated message f
potiuk closed issue #23863: Does airflow have task configuration based on
worker machine cpu or memory load balancing
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23863
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
msumit commented on code in PR #23861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23861#discussion_r879354885
##
airflow/config_templates/config.yml:
##
@@ -249,6 +249,14 @@
type: string
example: ~
default: "0"
+- name: default_task_retry_delay
+ d
skyboi1233 commented on code in PR #23861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23861#discussion_r879356149
##
airflow/config_templates/config.yml:
##
@@ -249,6 +249,14 @@
type: string
example: ~
default: "0"
+- name: default_task_retry_delay
+
uranusjr commented on code in PR #23861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23861#discussion_r879356526
##
airflow/config_templates/config.yml:
##
@@ -249,6 +249,14 @@
type: string
example: ~
default: "0"
+- name: default_task_retry_delay
+
uranusjr commented on PR #23812:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23812#issuecomment-1134573130
I wonder if we should silently return None when `sql` is empty, instead of
failing the task.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, p
msumit commented on PR #23861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23861#issuecomment-1134574755
> (putting a temporary hold on this)
>
> Isn't this already achievable using the "Cluster Policy" hooks? I'm wary
of "config sprawl" if we add lots of options.
Let me try to
eladkal commented on PR #23861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23861#issuecomment-1134580999
> Isn't this already achievable using the "Cluster Policy" hooks? I'm wary
of "config sprawl" if we add lots of options.
Cluster policy has weakness that it's not exposed to the e
ashb commented on PR #23861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23861#issuecomment-1134582393
How is cluster policy any different to a config setting in this regard?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
eladkal commented on PR #23861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23861#issuecomment-1134600986
> How is cluster policy any different to a config setting in this regard?
The config is picked up by the operator thus in the task details you will
see the default value being set
potiuk opened a new pull request, #23866:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23866
This change should significantly speed up Breeze experience (and
especially iterating over a change in Breeze for MacOS users -
independently if you are using x86 or arm architecture.
The
potiuk commented on PR #23866:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23866#issuecomment-1134605144
@dstandish @bbovenzi @kaxil @bowrna - I believe you use Mac OS. I hope you
will enjoy the 5x speed improvements that this change brings for MacOS Breeze
user running MyPy checks.
--
msumit commented on PR #23861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23861#issuecomment-1134606398
A couple of observations using the CP hook - The `retry_dealy` value is
already set when it comes to the hook, so we would need to make a lot of code
changes in `Baseoperator` to make it
potiuk commented on code in PR #23866:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23866#discussion_r879393276
##
scripts/ci/docker-compose/backend-mssql-docker-volume.yml:
##
@@ -20,3 +20,5 @@ services:
mssql:
volumes:
- mssql-db-volume:/var/opt/mssql
+volumes:
jyotidhiman0610 commented on issue #21955:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21955#issuecomment-1134626941
Hi, @mgorsk1 are you working on this or can I take this up?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
potiuk commented on PR #23812:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23812#issuecomment-1134628063
I think failing is more reasonable. I think explicit `SELECT 1 FROM DUAL` is
better one to indicate "empty" query and there are at least few scenarios where
empty response might be resul
jyotidhiman0610 commented on issue #20829:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20829#issuecomment-1134628224
Hi, @askmeegs are you working on this or can I take this up?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHu
jyotidhiman0610 commented on issue #22632:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22632#issuecomment-1134632016
Hi, can I take this up?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
kazanzhy commented on PR #23812:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23812#issuecomment-1134639957
@uranusjr there was a short discussion about the behavior
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23767
It seems that raising an error when `sql` parameter is an empty list will be
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #23866:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23866#issuecomment-1134644917
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and take the risk
potiuk commented on PR #23866:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23866#issuecomment-1134647191
> nice, thank you @potiuk
Actually thank Airflow Summit. I thought about it and attempted to fix it
while flying to London for the Airflow Summit opening today :) - that was ideal
potiuk commented on PR #23866:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23866#issuecomment-1134649694
BTW. Not that fast - some static checks failing in CI :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
potiuk commented on PR #23866:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23866#issuecomment-1134652689
Ah yeah. committed changing Python 3.7 -> 3.8 as I had no 3.7 image handy in
the plane after cleanup yesterday 🤦
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respon
potiuk commented on issue #22632:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22632#issuecomment-1134656471
go ahead
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To un
potiuk commented on issue #20829:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20829#issuecomment-1134657226
I will add you as assignee already @jyotidhiman0610 :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
U
potiuk commented on issue #21955:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/21955#issuecomment-1134657709
Feel free.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
potiuk merged PR #23597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23597
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.a
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new ec6761a5c0 Clean up f-strings in logging calls (#23
uranusjr opened a new issue, #23867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23867
### Body
Currently, running the (new) `breeze build-image` brings up two prompts if
any of the meta files are outdated:
```
$ breeze build-image
Good version of Docker: 20.10.14.
G
oriolcmp commented on issue #12985:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12985#issuecomment-1134718072
Hello,
After two years with this ticket open and after adding a fix like #19616
which seems was the same issue but in this case adding the "ti" as serializable
would have f
uranusjr commented on issue #23792:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23792#issuecomment-1134719462
I seem to recall there’s a bug on expanding a wrong number of tasks, but
can’t find it now. This _may_ have been fixed in main.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache G
uranusjr commented on issue #12985:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12985#issuecomment-1134723587
Feel free to propose a PR to add `ti` to the list.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
uranusjr opened a new issue, #23868:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23868
### Body
Currently, if any tests fail when `breeze tests` is run, Breeze 2 would emit
a traceback pointing to the `docker-compose` subprocess call. This is due to
Docker propagating the exit call
josh-fell commented on PR #22938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22938#issuecomment-1134740013
> @josh-fell Yep, totally follow. I removed the arg from the Operator. Do
you have an opinion whether the tenant should be stored in the connection as
the schema or as an extra?
jedcunningham merged PR #23859:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23859
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@ai
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jedcunningham pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 35620edd4b update K8S-KIND to 0.14.0 (#23859
uranusjr commented on PR #23237:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23237#issuecomment-1134750350
Should work now!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #23237:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23237#issuecomment-1134758881
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and take the risk
domagojrazum opened a new pull request, #23870:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23870
When this parameter is set, the dag_id string will be used as a regular
expression to match the available DAGs.
This enables multiple DAG backfills to be consecutively executed under the
sam
gmcrocetti commented on PR #23857:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23857#issuecomment-1134801928
Hey @vincbeck :).
Tagging you as requested o/.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abo
Taragolis opened a new issue, #23871:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23871
### Apache Airflow version
2.3.0 (latest released)
### What happened
Standalone DagProcessor which run in Apache Airflow Production Docker Image
failed with error
```
airf
potiuk commented on issue #23867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23867#issuecomment-1134824848
Oh absolutely :). It's been like that in the old breeze :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t
uranusjr merged PR #23237:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23237
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow
uranusjr closed issue #23233: Remove usage of `days_ago()` from test suite
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23233
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
uranusjr pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new f352ee63a5 Replaced all days_ago functions with d
josh-fell commented on code in PR #23704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23704#discussion_r879549311
##
airflow/providers/tabular/example_dags/example_tabular.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributo
Taragolis opened a new pull request, #23872:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23872
Not sure if additional tests required because it required mock os methods
just for compare PID = SID however let me know and I will add it
closes: #23871
---
**^ Add me
josh-fell commented on code in PR #23873:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23873#discussion_r879692977
##
airflow/providers/databricks/operators/databricks_repos.py:
##
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ def __init__(
self.git_provider = self.__detect_repo_provider__(git_
josh-fell opened a new pull request, #23873:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23873
Related: #23591
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst#pull-request-guidelines
alexott commented on code in PR #23873:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23873#discussion_r879693454
##
airflow/providers/databricks/operators/databricks_repos.py:
##
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ def __init__(
self.git_provider = self.__detect_repo_provider__(git_ur
josh-fell commented on code in PR #23873:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23873#discussion_r879694846
##
tests/providers/ssh/hooks/test_ssh.py:
##
@@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ def test_openssh_private_key(self):
def test_oneline_key(self):
with pytest.raises(E
snjypl commented on code in PR #23720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23720#discussion_r879714440
##
airflow/executors/kubernetes_executor.py:
##
@@ -530,13 +532,15 @@ def start(self) -> None:
self.kube_config.worker_pods_pending_timeout_check_interval,
pingzh commented on code in PR #21877:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/21877#discussion_r879715014
##
airflow/jobs/scheduler_job.py:
##
@@ -764,6 +765,26 @@ def _execute(self) -> None:
self.log.exception("Exception when executing
DagFileProcesso
josh-fell commented on code in PR #23848:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23848#discussion_r879712639
##
tests/system/providers/slack/example_slack.py:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license
Taragolis commented on PR #23872:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23872#issuecomment-1134954306
Also I found call `os.setpgid(0, 0)` in two other places
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/f352ee63a5d09546a7997ba8f2f8702a1ddb4af7/airflow/task/task_runner/standard_task_
josh-fell commented on PR #23704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23704#issuecomment-1134963962
Just to toss it out there, should net-new example DAGs live as system tests
based on AIP-47 now? Or since this is v0.0.1 of this provider that it can be
migrated over as the provider
denimalpaca opened a new issue, #23874:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23874
### Description
The new SQL Check Operators would provide templated quality checks so users
could quickly and easily add common data quality checks on columns and tables.
The resulting output
Taragolis commented on issue #23475:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23475#issuecomment-1134984937
As workaround - set Environment Variables for airflow service to use more
"pessimistic" retry strategy, rather than [default
one](https://boto3.amazonaws.com/v1/documentation/api
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on PR #23875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23875#issuecomment-1134990290
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our Contribution
alexkruc opened a new pull request, #23875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23875
Decreases the deprecation warnings for this test file from 71 to 19 :)
This function will be removed anyway in Airflow 3, so it's either to delete
the test or to remove the deprecation warnings.
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #23875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23875#issuecomment-1135105307
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and take the risk
schattian commented on PR #23658:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23658#issuecomment-1135138024
@potiuk could you please take a look at this one? would be nice to have,
personally I experience this bug regularly (once a week) on gke.
--
This is an automated message from the Ap
jedcunningham opened a new pull request, #23876:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23876
I just noticed we missed adding LocalKubernetesExecutor into the helm chart
docs. I've also reordered them to put the "core" executors first, and the
"combo" executors last.
--
This is an a
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #22793:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22793#issuecomment-1135261788
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for you
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #22329:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22329#issuecomment-1135261827
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for you
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #22676:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22676#issuecomment-1135261807
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for you
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #23876:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23876#issuecomment-1135276893
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not modify the
josh-fell opened a new pull request, #23877:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23877
Currently there are string-value evaluations of `compute`,
`nodegroup_role_arn`, and `fargate_pod_execution_role_arn` args in the
constructor of `EksCreateClusterOperator`. These args are all li
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #23877:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23877#issuecomment-1135323959
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not modify the
josh-fell commented on code in PR #23873:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23873#discussion_r879694846
##
tests/providers/ssh/hooks/test_ssh.py:
##
@@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ def test_openssh_private_key(self):
def test_oneline_key(self):
with pytest.raises(E
josh-fell commented on issue #16506:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16506#issuecomment-1135329841
Does the new
[`ignore_downstream_trigger_rules`](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/6b772f68db4f80b01ede836ddd47437d4aa1b43d/airflow/operators/python.py#L248)
param of the `S
epapineau commented on PR #22938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22938#issuecomment-1135339271
@josh-fell okay changes pushed 🎉
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the s
uranusjr commented on PR #23662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23662#issuecomment-1135359777
Instead of inheriting `CronDataIntervalTimetable` directly, I would prefer
the common logic be extracted out to a superclass, which both timetable clases
inherit.
I feel this cl
uranusjr commented on PR #23662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23662#issuecomment-1135361440
Or, if this is too big a scope and you really only want to “fix” the first
run of cron scheduling. Honestly the current behaviour sounds like a bug to me,
and arguably we might want to
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #23452:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/23452#issuecomment-1135362751
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and take the risk
uranusjr closed issue #23419: Add a DAG Run clear endpoint to REST API
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23419
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To un
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
uranusjr pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new b83cc9b5e2 Add clear DagRun endpoint. (#23451)
b8
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
